The MAR Method Versus the Visual Estimation Method in Predicting External Blood Loss
NCT ID: NCT06855472
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
237 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-07
2017-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main research questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the MAR method provide more accurate blood loss estimates than the Visual Estimation method on flat, non-absorbent surfaces?
* Does the MAR method take longer to estimate blood loss compared to the Visual Estimation method?
* Do demographic factors such as gender, height, and weight affect blood loss estimates using the MAR method?
* Do these demographic factors also influence the time required for estimation using the MAR method? Researchers will compare the MAR method with the Visual Estimation method to determine whether the MAR method is a useful tool for accurately estimating external blood loss in clinical skill training.
Participants will:
* Sign an Informed Consent Form at the start of the study
* Receive a 10-minute orientation session
* Receive a 2-minute MAR method training (for the intervention group-)
* Use either the MAR method or the Visual Estimation method for up to 60 seconds at each of the three stations
* Receive a 2-minute MAR method training (for the control group)
* Use the MAR method for up to 60 seconds at each of the three stations (for the control group)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Visual Mind Mapping in Nursing Education
NCT06815458
The Effect of Simulation and Peer Teaching Methods on Nursing Students
NCT06827418
Effect of Education Given With Jigsaw IV Learning Technique for Physical Assessment of Heart and Thorax on Knowledge and Skills of Nursing Students
NCT07003594
Comparison of Self Directed Learning and Small Group Teaching Methods on Pressure Injury Assessment
NCT05354687
Simulation Applications on the Level of Pressure Injury Knowledge and Evaluation
NCT05946291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For this study, the Professional Skills Laboratories were used as the physical setting. The scenarios were set up at three different stations, each positioned in a separate corner of a large room. Room dividers separated the stations, and each had a designated entrance and exit to prevent participants who had completed their estimations from encountering those who had not yet participated.
Two researchers designed three distinct simulated environments and scenarios for the study. A synthetic blood product was used to enhance the realism of the simulated blood loss cases. In line with the MAR method's design principles, all three stations featured flat, non-absorbent surfaces.
* Station 1: An acrylic (plexiglass) surface with 75 ml of blood.
* Station 2: A flat, varnished wood surface with 150 ml of blood.
* Station 3: A vinyl surface with 750 ml of blood.
Research Staff:
Three faculty researchers were present in the simulation area, overseeing orientation training for investigators and participants and coordinating activities at each station. Additionally, three medical student investigators were assigned to record blood volume estimates and estimation times.
Randomization:
Out of 237 eligible participants, 140 met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate. Since students from both departments had similar academic levels, ages, educational backgrounds, and no prior formal training in external blood loss estimation, the researchers used a non-stratified selection method. Participants were randomly assigned into two equal groups of 70 using a block randomization method (1:1 ratio) via the online service https://researchrandomizer.com/.
To assign participants, group names were written on paper, placed in a bag, and selected blindly.
* Group 1: Control group (Visual Estimation method), (n1:70).
* Group 2: Experimental group (MAR method), (n2:70). Group assignments were revealed to participants only when they arrived at the simulation room. To ensure allocation concealment, an independent researcher conducted both the randomization and group assignment before the trial began. While faculty researchers who prepared the stations knew the actual blood volumes, participants and study investigators who recorded the data were blinded to this information.
Study Description:
Student investigators at the stations received a 20-minute orientation before the study, covering its purpose, workflow, data form usage, and chronometer operation. Investigators recorded data in real-time as estimations were made. Neither participants nor investigators knew the actual blood volumes at the stations (double-blind design). At the start of the study, both groups received a 10-minute briefing, including:
* Signing the consent form
* Explaining the study's purpose
* Introducing the simulation lab and research team
To clearly describe the procedures, the study is presented in two distinct periods. Period I was conducted to obtain the primary outcomes based on the primary objectives of the study. During this period::
* Group 1 (Control): Estimated blood loss using the Visual Estimation (VE) method.
* Group 2 (Experimental): Received 1-2 minutes of MAR method training separately, then estimated blood loss using the MAR method at all three stations.
Investigators at each station recorded blood volume estimates and estimation times for both groups. Researcher analysed data providing intergroup records (Visual estimation method \[n1\] vs MAR method \[n2\]) and intragroup records (Visual method \[n1\] vs MAR method \[n1\])
Period II process was conducted to obtain the secondary outcomes based on the secondary objectives of the study. In this period::
•Group 1 (Previously Control): Received 1-2 minutes of MAR method training separately, then estimated blood loss using the MAR method at all three stations.
Investigators recorded blood volume estimates and estimation times. For secondary outcomes, data from 140 participants (MAR method \[n2\] plus MAR method \[n1\]) were analyzed to determine whether gender, height, and weight influenced blood loss estimates and estimation durations using the MAR method.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Visual Estimation Method (Control), (n1:70)
The Visual Estimation Method is the most commonly used technique for estimating external blood loss. It relies on quick visual assessment rather than precise measurement, providing an estimate within seconds.
No interventions assigned to this group
Group 2: The MAR Method (Intervention), (n2:70)
The MAR (Merlin, Alter, Raffel) method, which was first described by Merlin et al. in 2009, is an alternative clinical skill recommended for estimating the amount of external blood loss on flat surfaces and does not depend on visualization. The method can learn within 1-2 minutes. In this method, the participants are given 60 sec to complete their estimations.
The MAR method
The study was conducted in three isolated stations. Two faculty researchers designed the scenarios, while three others supervised training. Medical student investigators recorded blood loss estimates and estimation times.
Before the study, investigators received 20-minute training. Participants and investigators were blinded to actual blood volumes. Group 1 and Group 2 attended a 10-minute briefing, including consent and study introduction.
The study had two phases. In Phase 1, Group 1 used the Visual Estimation (VE) method, while Group 2 received a 2-minute MAR method training before making estimations. In Phase 2, Group 1 was trained in the MAR method and repeated estimations.A data form recorded demographics, blood loss estimates, and estimation times.
Group 1's VE data and Group 2's MAR data were compared between groups, while Group 1's VE and MAR data were analyzed within the group. Combined MAR data from both groups were used to assess the impact of gender, height, and weight.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The MAR method
The study was conducted in three isolated stations. Two faculty researchers designed the scenarios, while three others supervised training. Medical student investigators recorded blood loss estimates and estimation times.
Before the study, investigators received 20-minute training. Participants and investigators were blinded to actual blood volumes. Group 1 and Group 2 attended a 10-minute briefing, including consent and study introduction.
The study had two phases. In Phase 1, Group 1 used the Visual Estimation (VE) method, while Group 2 received a 2-minute MAR method training before making estimations. In Phase 2, Group 1 was trained in the MAR method and repeated estimations.A data form recorded demographics, blood loss estimates, and estimation times.
Group 1's VE data and Group 2's MAR data were compared between groups, while Group 1's VE and MAR data were analyzed within the group. Combined MAR data from both groups were used to assess the impact of gender, height, and weight.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No prior theoretical or practical training in estimating external blood loss
* Willingness to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Having received theoretical or practical training in estimating external blood loss
* Declining to participate in the study
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baskent University
OTHER
Betül Akbuğa Özel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Betül Akbuğa Özel
Assistant Professor, MD, FTBEM, MSc, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Betul Akbuga Ozel, Asst.Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baskent University
Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine
Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Merlin MA, Alter SM, Raffel B, Pryor PW 2nd. External blood loss estimation using the MAR Method. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;27(9):1085-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.039.
Yeung CY, Yim WW, Chan SY, Lo RSL, Leung LY, Hung KKC, Graham CA. Improvement of blood loss volume estimation by paramedics using a pictorial nomogram: A developmental study. Injury. 2017 Dec;48(12):2693-2698. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.045. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Ashburn JC, Harrison T, Ham JJ, Strote J. Emergency physician estimation of blood loss. West J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;13(4):376-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6669.
Williams B, Boyle M. Estimation of external blood loss by paramedics: is there any point? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):502-6. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000532x.
Shafi S, Kauder DR. Fluid resuscitation and blood replacement in patients with polytrauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 May;(422):37-42. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000129149.15141.0c.
Akbuga Ozel B, Ozel G, Mamak Ekinci EB, Demirtola AE, Sahin G, Aksoy G, Yanikyurek I, Karaaslan MU. The MAR method versus the visual estimation method in predicting external blood loss: a randomized controlled study. Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 24;15(1):31091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16169-0.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Merlin MA, Alter SM, Raffel B, Pryor PW 2nd. External blood loss estimation using the MAR Method. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;27(9):1085-90.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KA17/92
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.