The Aim of Study is Translate and Adapt the Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) Instrument Into Turkish and Psycho-metrically Test Its Reliability and Validity Among Patients Who Had Foot and Ankle Disorders or Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03262324
Last Updated: 2022-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
69 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-09-30
2021-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Case-Based Education on the Development of Nursing Students' Clinical Reasoning Skills
NCT05504824
The Effect of an Interactive Video on Nursing Students' Learning in the Care of Anti-Embolism Stockings
NCT06734104
Adaptation of High Activity Arthroplasty Score to Turkish
NCT05217264
The Effectiveness of E-Learning Application Developed for Chest Tube Care in Nursing Students
NCT06745713
The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Visual Case Analysis on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Pressure Injury Prevention: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06978283
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VAS-FA Turkish version
Self-reported outcome questionnaires
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants who have foot and ankle disorders
* Participants must have an orthopedic intervention last 3 months;
1. Conservative intervention
2. Surgery intervention
Exclusion Criteria
* Positive medical history concerning the entire lower extremity,
1. Diabetes mellitus
2. Drug abuse
3. Psychiatric diseases
4. Rheumatoid arthritis
5. Neurological diseases
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hasan Kalyoncu University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Serkan Usgu
Assistant Professor of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Serkan Usgu, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Günseli Usgu, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Can Muslu, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hasan kalyoncu üniversity
Gaziantep, , Turkey (Türkiye)
İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hunt KJ, Hurwit D. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):e118(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01476.
Angthong C, Chernchujit B, Suntharapa T, Harnroongroj T. Visual analogue scale foot and ankle: validity and reliability of Thai version of the new outcome score in subjective form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Aug;94(8):952-7.
Richter, M., Zech, S., Geerling, J., Frink, M., Knobloch, K., & Krettek, C. (2006). A new foot and ankle outcome score: Questionnaire based, subjective, Visual-Analogue-Scale, validated and computerized. Foot and ankle surgery, 12(4), 191-199.
Nair AV, Shamsuddin K, John PS, Hamalainen JA, Kurien MA. Correlation of visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA) to AOFAS score in malleolar fractures using Indian language questionnare. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jun;21(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Stuber J, Zech S, Bay R, Qazzaz A, Richter M. Normative data of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) for pathological conditions. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Sep;17(3):166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):371-83.
Lin CW, Moseley AM, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC. The lower extremity functional scale has good clinimetric properties in people with ankle fracture. Phys Ther. 2009 Jun;89(6):580-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080290. Epub 2009 May 7.
Button G, Pinney S. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Aug;25(8):521-5. doi: 10.1177/107110070402500802.
Goldstein CL, Schemitsch E, Bhandari M, Mathew G, Petrisor BA. Comparison of different outcome instruments following foot and ankle trauma. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Dec;31(12):1075-80. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.1075.
Repo JP, Tukiainen EJ, Roine RP, Kautiainen H, Lindahl J, Ilves O, Jarvenpaa S, Hakkinen A. Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA). Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Dec;24(6):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.