The Validity and Reliability Study of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assesment Tool

NCT ID: NCT04811638

Last Updated: 2023-08-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-11

Study Completion Date

2021-01-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aimed at providing an translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assesment Tool (CPAx) and tested its reliability and validity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Survival has increased in the ICU due to technological developments , but physical disability after discharge has become an important problem. İntensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness(ICU-AW) is seen in most of the patients admitted in this unit. The biggest reasons for ICU-AW are; sepsis, multiple organ failure and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The use of measurement tools to evaluate disabilities during stay and after discharge in intensive care unit, is a subject that has been researched all over the world.. These measurement tools provide; monitoring and evaluation during the ICU admission and assessment efficacy of treatment in the unit. The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool(CPAX) has been shown to valid, reliable and to exhibited strong clinimetric properties. CPAx is a numerical measurement tool, rated according to the 6-point Guttman Scale, from complete dependence to independence and consist of ten physical function parameters. This study is aimed at providing an translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assesment Tool (CPAx) and tested its reliability and validity. The protocol includes a pre-test of the Turkish version on 10 patients, a final revision, and a validation on a sample of 40 İCU patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ICU Patients ICU Acquired Weakness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assesment Tools

The validation of the CPAX tools will focus on the validity of constructs, internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability. PFIT used for criterion validity.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 18 years
* Critical adult patients
* Patients who were hospitalized for more than 48 hours in an ICU

Exclusion Criteria

* Unstable fracture
* Limb deformities and dysfunction
* Myasthenia gravis
* Neuromuscular dysfunction
* Patients who diagnosed COVİD-19
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Park Hospital Istanbul

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mehmet Burak Uyaroğlu

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Esra Pehlivan, Ass.Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Mehmet Burak Uyaroğlu, PT, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Sümeyye Akcay, PT, MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Gamze Koyutürk, PT, MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Hakan Parlak, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Istinye University Bahcesehir Hospital

Kürsat Baydilli, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mehmet Burak Uyaroğlu

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Saglik Bilimleri University

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.