Using Mean Ages on Clothing Size Labels in Revised Advanced Pediatric Life Support Formulas for Weight Estimation
NCT ID: NCT02455674
Last Updated: 2015-05-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1094 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-12-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Basic Life Support (BLS) Training by Homemade Manikin
NCT05191992
The Effect of the Mobile Application Developed for Home Care of Preterm
NCT05438056
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the PedsQL 3.0 Neuromuscular Module for 2-to 4- Year-old
NCT05539456
Turkish Validation of The Drooling Impact Scale
NCT04132765
Preventing Home Accidents With Simulation Based Training
NCT07235761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Age under 6 years
All children 1 to 6 years
Used formula for weight calculation:
Children 1-5 years: Weight (kg) = (2 × age in years) + 8
No interventions assigned to this group
Age over 6 years
All children 6 to 12 years
Used formula for weight calculation:
Children 6-12 years: Weight (kg) = (3 × age in years) + 7
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* No weighing in ED
* No clothing size label information
* Refused to participate
1 Year
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Can K Akyol, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency
Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Young TP, Washington O, Flanery A, Guptill M, Reibling ET, Brown L, Barcega B. Comparison of the finger counting method, the Broselow tape and common weight estimation formulae in Filipino children after Typhoon Haiyan. Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Jun;27(3):239-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12382. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
Graves L, Chayen G, Peat J, O'Leary F. A comparison of actual to estimated weights in Australian children attending a tertiary children's' hospital, using the original and updated APLS, Luscombe and Owens, Best Guess formulae and the Broselow tape. Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):392-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
Sanghera N, Chan PY, Khaki ZF, Planner C, Lee KK, Cranswick NE, Wong IC. Interventions of hospital pharmacists in improving drug therapy in children: a systematic literature review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(11):1031-47. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629110-00003.
Wells M, Coovadia A, Kramer E, Goldstein L. The PAWPER tape: A new concept tape-based device that increases the accuracy of weight estimation in children through the inclusion of a modifier based on body habitus. Resuscitation. 2013 Feb;84(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
Argall JA, Wright N, Mackway-Jones K, Jackson R. A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Sep;88(9):789-90. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.789. No abstract available.
Kelly AM, Nguyen K, Krieser D. Validation of the Luscombe weight formula for estimating children's weight. Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Feb;23(1):59-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01351.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
Luscombe MD, Owens BD, Burke D. Weight estimation in paediatrics: a comparison of the APLS formula and the formula 'Weight=3(age)+7'. Emerg Med J. 2011 Jul;28(7):590-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.087288. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
Thompson MT, Reading MJ, Acworth JP. Best Guess method for age-based weight estimation in paediatric emergencies: validation and comparison with current methods. Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Dec;19(6):535-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01031.x.
van Furth R, Braat AG, Leijh PC, Klein F. Opsonic activity and composition of five intramuscular gammaglobulin preparations. J Infect. 1986 Nov;13(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(86)91256-9.
Sinha M, Lezine MW, Frechette A, Foster KN. Weighing the pediatric patient during trauma resuscitation and its concordance with estimated weight using Broselow Luten Emergency Tape. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jun;28(6):544-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318258ac2e.
Lim CA, Kaufman BJ, O'Connor J Jr, Cunningham SJ. Accuracy of weight estimates in pediatric patients by prehospital Emergency Medical Services personnel. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;31(7):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 21.
Elgie LD, Williams AR. Using age on clothes size label to estimate weight in emergency paediatric patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(5):338-40. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328355abc2.
Krieser D, Nguyen K, Kerr D, Jolley D, Clooney M, Kelly AM. Parental weight estimation of their child's weight is more accurate than other weight estimation methods for determining children's weight in an emergency department? Emerg Med J. 2007 Nov;24(11):756-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.047993.
Leffler S, Hayes M. Analysis of parental estimates of children's weights in the ED. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):167-70. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70137-9.
Rosenberg M, Greenberger S, Rawal A, Latimer-Pierson J, Thundiyil J. Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;29(5):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
Nieman CT, Manacci CF, Super DM, Mancuso C, Fallon WF Jr. Use of the Broselow tape may result in the underresuscitation of children. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1011-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.042.
Harris M, Patterson J, Morse J. Doctors, nurses, and parents are equally poor at estimating pediatric weights. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999 Feb;15(1):17-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199902000-00005.
Greig A, Ryan J, Glucksman E. How good are doctors at estimating children's weight? J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Mar;14(2):101-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.2.101.
Meguerdichian MJ, Clapper TC. The Broselow tape as an effective medication dosing instrument: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Aug;27(4):416-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 8. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AntalyaTRH003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.