Three Debriefing Methods in Virtual Patient Simulation

NCT ID: NCT06677398

Last Updated: 2025-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In simulation-based training, the debriefing session is considered a cornerstone of learning. Therefore, this study aims to compare two different methods of debriefing sessions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Virtual Patient Debriefing Method Nursing Student

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel group-randomized trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Experimental group that used one of the debriefing methods

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Debriefing Method 1

Intervention Type OTHER

The researchers used a debriefing method that they chose after a virtual simulation

Group B

Experimental group that used one of the debriefing methods

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Debriefing Method 2

Intervention Type OTHER

The researchers used a debriefing method that they chose after a virtual simulation

Group C

A control group that used none of the debriefing methods

Group Type OTHER

Debriefing Method VP

Intervention Type OTHER

The researchers used the debriefing method that virtual patient simulator presents

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Debriefing Method 1

The researchers used a debriefing method that they chose after a virtual simulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Debriefing Method VP

The researchers used the debriefing method that virtual patient simulator presents

Intervention Type OTHER

Debriefing Method 2

The researchers used a debriefing method that they chose after a virtual simulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being 4th grade nursing student at a nursing faculty

Exclusion Criteria

* Not having participated in simulation before and not having practiced with a virtual patient.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gül ŞAHİN KARADUMAN

Asst. Prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing

Ankara, Etlik, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dreifuerst, K.T., 2015. Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clin Simul Nurs 11, 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Decker, S., Alinier, G., Crawford, S.B., Gordon, R.M., Jenkins, D., Wilson, C., 2021. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM The Debriefing Process. Clin Simul Nurs 58, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould J, Lin Y, Cook DA, Pusic M, Hui J, Moher D, Egger M, Auerbach M; International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE) Reporting Guidelines Investigators. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jul 25;1:25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0025-y. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29449994 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Date: 10.09.2024 No:2024-435

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.