Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-03
2025-05-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Reflective Thinking Method on Ethical Decision Making, Professional Values and Compassion Level
NCT06675669
Effect of Concept Mapping Teaching Method on Critical Thinking Skills of Medical Students
NCT02816242
Effect of Project Planning Course on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking, Lifelong Learning, and Innovativeness
NCT07090967
Effect of Critical Thinking Disposition Program on Developing Reflective Thinking and Motivation to Learn Among Nursing Students
NCT07334158
Position and Communication Skills Simulation
NCT05685459
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
* Does collecting data from the patient using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; clinical decision-making level?
* Does preparing a patient care plan using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; reflective thinking skill level in the clinic?
Research Process:
* Both groups will be administered sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, reflective thinking determination scale and teaching material evaluation form as face-to-face pre-test before the training.
* The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan.
* The experimental group will be given face-to-face training before starting the application. The scope of the training will consist of the definition of concept mapping, the aims and benefits of its use in the nursing education process, the principles of concept mapping, the introduction of the materials to be used in the process of data collection and care plan preparation, concept mapping examples specific to 3 different medical cases to improve nursing student s; understanding and comprehension of concept mapping and to increase their interest in learning techniques.
* After the training, students will be asked to collect data and make a care plan using a concept map.
* After data collection, face-to-face sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, scale for determining the level of reflective thinking and teaching material evaluation form will be applied as a post-test. Population and sample: G\*Power 3.1.9.7 sampling calculation programme was used to calculate the sample size in the study. Considering the mean±standard deviation values of the Clinical Decision Making in Nursing scale, the total sample size was calculated as 56, with a minimum of 28 for each group, with an effect size of 0.79 and a margin of error of ± 0.05 at the 82% confidence interval level. However, the research will be started with 33 participants by taking 20% more than the sample size determined by taking into account the situation of the participants leaving the research during the process.
Statistical Method(s): The data obtained from the study will be evaluated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 25.0 programme. Number, percentage, standard deviation, mean, min-max values will be used to define the data. According to the measurement level of the data, correlation analysis or chi-square dependency tests will be used for the relationships between variables. The suitability of continuous variables for normal distribution will be evaluated by Kolmogrov-Simirnov test. In group comparisons, Anova will be used for variables that fit the normal distribution, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests will be used for variables that do not fit the normal distribution. 0,05 will be used as significance level, and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of ia small 0,05, and there is no significant difference in case of is small 0,05.
The researchers will compare the control and experimental groups to see whether the use of concept maps in clinical practice has an effect on student s; clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills.
It is thought that the data obtained as a result of the study will support innovative applications, and at the same time, it will be explanatory and guiding about whether the use of concept maps is effective in developing student s; clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Traditional
The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan.
No interventions assigned to this group
Concept Map
The experimental group will collect data and make a maintenance plan by using a concept map after the training.
Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students
Concept map will be used in clinical practice in nursing students.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students
Concept map will be used in clinical practice in nursing students.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To agree to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Not participating in the training given by the researchers before the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nilgun Sert Bas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nilgun Sert Bas
Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nilgün Sert Baş, RN, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara Medipol University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Medipol University
Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Culha, I. Active learning methods used in nursing education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2019; 3(2), 74-86.
Wu HZ, Wu QT. Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. J Int Med Res. 2020 Mar;48(3):300060519893225. doi: 10.1177/0300060519893225.
World Health Organization.
Amaniyan S, Pouyesh V, Bashiri Y, Snelgrove S, Vaismoradi M. Comparison of the Conceptual Map and Traditional Lecture Methods on Students' Learning Based on the VARK Learning Style Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jul 8;6:2377960820940550. doi: 10.1177/2377960820940550. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
Tutticci N, Lewis PA, Coyer F. Measuring third year undergraduate nursing students' reflective thinking skills and critical reflection self-efficacy following high fidelity simulation: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 May;18:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
Karacabay, K, Savcı A, Öztürk B. Cerrahi Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Dersi Alan Öğrencilerin Kendi Kendine Öğrenme, Klinik Karar Verme ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 10.2 (2022): 667-680.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-81477236-604.01.01-2747
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.