Effects of Constructive Debriefing on Procedural Skills and Satisfaction of Nursing Students in Low Fidelity Context. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

NCT ID: NCT04992091

Last Updated: 2021-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-05

Study Completion Date

2020-05-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purposes: This study was set out to measure the effectiveness of constructive debriefing on procedural skills and satisfaction of nursing students in the low-fidelity context in comparison to traditional debriefing.

Method: The randomized controlled (Parallel double blinded) trial design was used.

Participant: Out of 51 approached, 34 students were selected from the list of participants by a data collector using simple random sampling technique. Following, block randomization was applied using Microsoft Excel to create two equivalent (n=17) groups i.e. experimental and non-experimental.

Setting: The study was conducted in private college of nursing Islamabad Pakistan Intervention: The experimental group received constructive debriefing and non-experimental group received the traditional debriefing. The data were collected using suctioning, sterile dressing skills checklist, and debriefing reflection subscale of Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Procedural Skill. Learning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CONSTRUCTIVE DEBRIEFING

interventional group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

constructive debriefing

Intervention Type OTHER

Constructive debriefing was applied to an interventional group Traditional debriefing was applied on noninterventional group

traditional debriefing

noninterventional group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

constructive debriefing

Constructive debriefing was applied to an interventional group Traditional debriefing was applied on noninterventional group

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

traditional debrieifng

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Students who were enrolled in the Adult Health Nursing (AHN) course were included in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Studentsnts who were repeating the course and were absent for two or more days during skills demonstration and signing off were excluded
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

27 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bushra Sultan

Bushra Sultan

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bushra

Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB# 264-754-2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.