High Fidelity Simulation-based Learning Approach in Maternal and Infant Care
NCT ID: NCT06722248
Last Updated: 2025-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
158 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-01
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary outcome: breastfeeding self-efficacy scores and knowledge in the intervention compared to the control group Secondary outcome: Simulation Design Scale and Education Practices Questionnaire
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Skills Learning and Self-confidence in Learning in High-fidelity Simulation
NCT05111327
High-Fidelity Simulation
NCT06935773
Gamification-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning
NCT07125131
A Blended Learning to Enhance Communication Skill Competence and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students in Clinical Handovers
NCT05150067
Scape Room With High Fidelity Simulators
NCT05122871
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nursing students commonly reported feeling unprepared in maternity and infant care clinical setting or lack competencies. Additionally, nurses are concerned about the clinical reasoning skills of new graduates, which may lead to poor quality of infants or maternal outcomes. Despite this importance, it is difficult to provide more clinical opportunities especially during COVID pandemics. High-fidelity simulation-based learning (HFS) can help to bridge the gap between theory and practice, with manikin citing the similarities to practice in a 'real' situation. By incorporating different scenarios, prebriefing and debriefing into the HFS, students can enhance their learning experience. However, there is a lack of studies specifically examining the use of HFS in baby care and breastfeeding among nursing students. The impact of HFS on learning outcomes, including knowledge and skills, problem solving abilities, and learning experience are unclear.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group with HFS baby
For intervention group, the high fidelity simulation session will be arranged earlier.
.
high fidelity simulation-based training
The intervention is a two-hour high-fidelity simulation training session focusing on newborn assessment, care practices, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding. It uses SimBaby mannequins and breastfeeding models to mimic the hospital environment. Scenarios are tailored to nursing students' learning levels and reviewed by experienced midwives.
The training includes:
Prebriefing: Introduction of learning objectives, scenario background, simulation familiarization, confidentiality discussions, and ground rules.
Intervention: Scenario-based training on baby care and breastfeeding. Debriefing: Plus-delta debriefing model reviewed by simulation educators. The training will be conducted in the nursing simulation laboratory.
conventional training
Conventional training includes lecture, tutorial and basic lab with low-fidelity mannequins.
Control group with conventional
For control group, they will undergo convention training. An identical simulation session will be provided for the control group after completion of the study
conventional training
Conventional training includes lecture, tutorial and basic lab with low-fidelity mannequins.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
high fidelity simulation-based training
The intervention is a two-hour high-fidelity simulation training session focusing on newborn assessment, care practices, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding. It uses SimBaby mannequins and breastfeeding models to mimic the hospital environment. Scenarios are tailored to nursing students' learning levels and reviewed by experienced midwives.
The training includes:
Prebriefing: Introduction of learning objectives, scenario background, simulation familiarization, confidentiality discussions, and ground rules.
Intervention: Scenario-based training on baby care and breastfeeding. Debriefing: Plus-delta debriefing model reviewed by simulation educators. The training will be conducted in the nursing simulation laboratory.
conventional training
Conventional training includes lecture, tutorial and basic lab with low-fidelity mannequins.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* newly enrolled obstetric course
* can provide consent for simulation confidentiality
* do not have previous clinical experience or training in obstetrical units
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wai Ming CHUNG
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
hku
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hong Kong Metropolitan University
Hong Kong, Hksar, Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Akalin A, Sahin S. The impact of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision-making for the management of pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;150(3):354-360. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13243. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
Anderson OS, Weirauch K, Roper R, Phillips J, McCabe C, Chuisano SA, Sadovnikova A. The Efficacy of Hybrid Telesimulation with Standardized Patients in Teaching Medical Students Clinical Lactation Skills: A Pilot Study. Breastfeed Med. 2021 Apr;16(4):332-337. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0253. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
Alshehri FD, Jones S, Harrison D. The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students' clinical reasoning-related skills: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105679. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Au ML, Tong LK, Li YY, Ng WI, Wang SC. Impact of scenario validity and group size on learning outcomes in high-fidelity simulation: A systematics review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105705. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105705. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
Blackman I, Sweet L, Byrne J. Using Rasch analysis to identify midwifery students' learning about providing breastfeeding support. Women Birth. 2015 Sep;28(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, Eppich W. Faculty Development for Simulation Programs: Five Issues for the Future of Debriefing Training. Simul Healthc. 2015 Aug;10(4):217-22. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090.
Cobbett S, Snelgrove-Clarke E. Virtual versus face-to-face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge, anxiety, and self-confidence in maternal-newborn nursing: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
Dennis CL. The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale: psychometric assessment of the short form. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):734-44. doi: 10.1177/0884217503258459.
Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2015 Apr;10(2):106-15. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072.
Eppich WJ, Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould JM, Siddall VJ, Cheng A. Structuring feedback and debriefing to achieve mastery learning goals. Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1501-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000934.
Fan HSL, Fong DYT, Lok KYW, Tarrant M. The Association Between Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Mode of Infant Feeding. Breastfeed Med. 2022 Aug;17(8):687-697. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0059. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):115-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539. No abstract available.
Franklin AE, Burns P, Lee CS. Psychometric testing on the NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire using a sample of pre-licensure novice nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Oct;34(10):1298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
Gozali A, Gibson S, Lipton LR, Pressman AW, Hammond BS, Dumitriu D. Assessing the effectiveness of a pediatrician-led newborn parenting class on maternal newborn-care knowledge, confidence and anxiety: A quasi-randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Aug;147:105082. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105082. Epub 2020 May 23.
Grabowski A, Chuisano SA, Strock K, Zielinski R, Anderson OS, Sadovnikova A. A pilot study to evaluate the effect of classroom-based high-fidelity simulation on midwifery students' self-efficacy in clinical lactation and perceived translation of skills to the care of the breastfeeding mother-infant dyad. Midwifery. 2021 Nov;102:103078. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103078. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
Gregory A, Penrose K, Morrison C, Dennis CL, MacArthur C. Psychometric properties of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form in an ethnically diverse U.K. sample. Public Health Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):278-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2008.00705.x.
Al Khasawneh E, Arulappan J, Natarajan JR, Raman S, Isac C. Efficacy of Simulation Using NLN/Jeffries Nursing Education Simulation Framework on Satisfaction and Self-Confidence of Undergraduate Nursing Students in a Middle-Eastern Country. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Apr 20;7:23779608211011316. doi: 10.1177/23779608211011316. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
MacKinnon K, Marcellus L, Rivers J, Gordon C, Ryan M, Butcher D. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
Scholz C, Mann C, Kopp V, Kost B, Kainer F, Fischer MR. High-fidelity simulation increases obstetric self-assurance and skills in undergraduate medical students. J Perinat Med. 2012 Nov;40(6):607-13. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0052.
Melchionda MM, Aletti G, Mauri PA. Validation of a self-efficacy survey for Italian midwifery students with regard to breastfeeding support. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 May;37:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Mulyadi M, Tonapa SI, Rompas SSJ, Wang RH, Lee BO. Effects of simulation technology-based learning on nursing students' learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105127. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105127. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Ilgen JS, Schmidt HG, Mamede S. The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking. Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421.
Pies C, Parthasarathy P, Posner SF. Integrating the life course perspective into a local maternal and child health program. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16(3):649-55. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0800-2.
Prepelita T, Ricchi A, Messina MP, Molinazzi MT, Cappadona R, Fieschi L, Nespoli A, Guana M, Cervi G, Parma D, Mauri PA, Artioli G, Banchelli F, Foa C, Neri I. Self-efficacy in breastfeeding support: a research on Italian midwifery students. Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 13;91(2-S):27-34. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9149.
Rashwan ZI, El Sheshtawy OR, Abdelhalim GE, Eweida RS, Khamis GM. Scenario-based clinical simulation: Bridging the gap between intern-students' anxiety and provision of holistic nursing care for preterm neonates. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jul;54:103121. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103121. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
Schertzer K, Patti L. In Situ Debriefing in Medical Simulation. 2022 Sep 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549876/
Spencer RL, Stephenson J, Thomas C. "One of those things the student is left to do". Student midwives' experience of infant feeding education. A phenomenological study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103416. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103416. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Tonapa SI, Mulyadi M, Ho KHM, Efendi F. Effectiveness of using high-fidelity simulation on learning outcomes in undergraduate nursing education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jan;27(2):444-458. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202301_31040.
Tong LK, Li YY, Au ML, Wang SC, Ng WI. High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Tosun N. The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemp Nurse. 2017 Feb;53(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: Revised, Updated and Expanded for Integrated Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK153471/
Yang SF, Salamonson Y, Burns E, Schmied V. Breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes of health professional students: a systematic review. Int Breastfeed J. 2018 Feb 20;13:8. doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0153-1. eCollection 2018.
Zackoff MW, Israel SW, Browning WL, Fleming AE. Use of simulation to teach appropriate management of a crying infant. Med Teach. 2014 Feb;36(2):181. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.789496. Epub 2013 Apr 30. No abstract available.
Zhu Y, Geng C, Pei X, Chen X. Baccalaureate nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation: protocol for a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e040171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040171.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National League for Nursing. Simulation Design Scale (Student Version) (2005)
National League for Nursing. Educational Practices Questionnaire (Student Version) (2005)
Create a blocked randomisation list
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HFSBLBF1224
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.