Effectiveness of High Fidelity Simulation for Safety in the Medication Process in Intensive Care
NCT ID: NCT03828526
Last Updated: 2019-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-01
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Simulation With Nursing Students in the Care of Patients With Sepsis
NCT04512183
Implementation of Realistic Simulation as Patient Safety Improvement Method
NCT02653781
Effect of Realistic Simulation and Digital Educational Platforms for Learning Nursing Student
NCT04940455
Effects of the in Situ Simulation to Competencies in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Nursing Team.
NCT03626272
Nursing Students' Recognition of and Response to Deteriorating Patients
NCT04063319
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the high fidelity simulation for learning related to the drug preparation and administration process in the scenario of critical patient care in the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains for undergraduate students of the nursing course.
Hypothesis of the study
Null hypothesis
There will be no difference between learning through high fidelity simulation and traditional teaching / low fidelity simulation.
Alternative hypothesis
The high fidelity simulation strategy improves the performance of nursing students in drug administration more significantly when compared to traditional teaching / low fidelity simulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Fidelity Simulation
Students will be exposed to the intensive care setting where they will have to solve issues related to general nursing care, including the stages of the medication process that involve the nurses' performance and their complexity.
During the experience of the scenario will be provoked external factors, such as telephone ringing, visit of the professional of the infection commission, to evaluate the reactions of the student and the strategies adopted to minimize the occurrence of adverse events against such external factors.
Subsequently, they will participate in the debriefing, where they will be reflected on the positives and those that should be adjusted to promote safer nursing care related to drug administration.
High Fidelity Simulation
Teaching strategy based on high fidelity simulation, which simulates the reality of health care to promote meaningful learning.
Traditional teaching strategy
Participants will be submitted to an expository-dialogue class, which will be given based on the recent literature and subdivided into the following axes: 1) patient safety; 2) medication process; 3) adverse drug events; 4) the critical patient in intensive care and its specificities. Afterwards, students will be directed to an environment with an anatomical piece for drug preparation and administration training.
Traditional teaching strategy
Classroom-based strategy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Fidelity Simulation
Teaching strategy based on high fidelity simulation, which simulates the reality of health care to promote meaningful learning.
Traditional teaching strategy
Classroom-based strategy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Brasilia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marcia Cristina da Silva Magro
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcia CS Magro, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Brasilia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Breno de Sousa Santana
BrasÃlia, Federal District, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adams AJ, Wasson EA, Admire JR, Pablo Gomez P, Babayeuski RA, Sako EY, Willis RE. A Comparison of Teaching Modalities and Fidelity of Simulation Levels in Teaching Resuscitation Scenarios. J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 20.
Bingham AL, Sen S, Finn LA, Cawley MJ. Retention of advanced cardiac life support knowledge and skills following high-fidelity mannequin simulation training. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Feb 17;79(1):12. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79112.
Choi I, Lee SM, Flynn L, Kim CM, Lee S, Kim NK, Suh DC. Incidence and treatment costs attributable to medication errors in hospitalized patients. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 May-Jun;12(3):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Cortegiani A, Russotto V, Montalto F, Iozzo P, Palmeri C, Raineri SM, Giarratano A. Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Medical Students' Knowledge about Advanced Life Support: A Randomized Study. PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0125685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125685. eCollection 2015.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225182/
Marvanova M, Henkel PJ. Collaborating on medication errors in nursing. Clin Teach. 2018 Apr;15(2):163-168. doi: 10.1111/tct.12655. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
Negri EC, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Pereira GA Junior, Almeida RGDS, Pedersoli CE. Clinical simulation with dramatization: gains perceived by students and health professionals. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Aug 3;25:e2916. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1807.2916.
Renata Grou Volpe C, Moura Pinho DL, Morato Stival M, Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski M. Medication errors in a public hospital in Brazil. Br J Nurs. 2014 Jun 12-25;23(11):552, 553-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.11.552.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1227-7554
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.