Effects of the in Situ Simulation to Competencies in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Nursing Team.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: In situ simulation is a methodology that meets the concept of permanent education, since it allows learning from the context of practice and in the work environment itself.

Objective: to compare the development of skills (knowledge and skills) for CPR between groups submitted to different in situ simulation periodicities, and to identify the level of confidence to participate in a CPR.

Method: A randomized controlled, non-blind study comparing 3 periodicities of educational intervention performed by in situ simulation. This study will include nursing professionals from the nephrology department of a university hospital. The sample will be composed of 24 randomized participants in the groups, using opaque envelopes for each periodicity of training and professional category, being subdivided into 3 groups of periodicities with intervals of 2, 4 and 8 months. The instruments will evaluate the knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the perception of preparation for performing the maneuvers.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Self-training

NCT03729037

Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation

COMPLETED NA

Effectiveness of Simulation With Nursing Students in the Care of Patients With Sepsis

NCT04512183

Learning Process in Nursing Graduation Stress

UNKNOWN NA

Implementation of Realistic Simulation as Patient Safety Improvement Method

NCT02653781

Compliance Behavior

UNKNOWN NA

Effectiveness of High Fidelity Simulation for Safety in the Medication Process in Intensive Care

NCT03828526

Learning Process in Nursing Graduation Compliant Behavior

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluating the Impact of In-Situ Simulation on Interprofessional Healthcare Team Training

NCT07346937

in Situ Simulation Simulation in Training Center

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective is to compare the development of skills (knowledge and skills) for CPR between groups submitted to different in situ simulation periodicities, and to identify the level of confidence to attend a CPR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Learning Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a randomized, non-blind controlled trial that will compare three periodicities of an educational intervention to be performed through in situ simulation. Group A will be submitted to intervention at 8-month intervals, group B every four months and group C every two months; each group will be divided into two subgroups, totaling six subgroups consisting of one nurse and three nursing technicians.

The research was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, under approval certificate no. 56516216.9.0000.5345, and of the Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul/PUCRS, under approval certificate no. 56516216.9.3001.5336.

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

8-month intervals

Participants will be submitted to the educational intervention with in situ simulation every 8 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

The simulation scenarios were constructed using the service environment, with real equipment and materials and a low fidelity mannequin. The interventions were not filmed, and the clinical cases elaborated were fictitious, with clear objectives and developed according to the context of the unit. The simulations took place during the working hours of the participants, with the expected duration of the 10 minutes (average) for the scenario, and the average duration of the debriefing was 10 minutes, which took place immediately after the simulation and in the same location of the scenario.

4-month intervals

Participants will be submitted to the educational intervention with in situ simulation every 4 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

The simulation scenarios were constructed using the service environment, with real equipment and materials and a low fidelity mannequin. The interventions were not filmed, and the clinical cases elaborated were fictitious, with clear objectives and developed according to the context of the unit. The simulations took place during the working hours of the participants, with the expected duration of the 10 minutes (average) for the scenario, and the average duration of the debriefing was 10 minutes, which took place immediately after the simulation and in the same location of the scenario.

2-month intervals

Participants will be submitted to the educational intervention with in situ simulation every 2 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

The simulation scenarios were constructed using the service environment, with real equipment and materials and a low fidelity mannequin. The interventions were not filmed, and the clinical cases elaborated were fictitious, with clear objectives and developed according to the context of the unit. The simulations took place during the working hours of the participants, with the expected duration of the 10 minutes (average) for the scenario, and the average duration of the debriefing was 10 minutes, which took place immediately after the simulation and in the same location of the scenario.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

educational intervention

The simulation scenarios were constructed using the service environment, with real equipment and materials and a low fidelity mannequin. The interventions were not filmed, and the clinical cases elaborated were fictitious, with clear objectives and developed according to the context of the unit. The simulations took place during the working hours of the participants, with the expected duration of the 10 minutes (average) for the scenario, and the average duration of the debriefing was 10 minutes, which took place immediately after the simulation and in the same location of the scenario.

Intervention Type OTHER