The Learning Outcome of Resuscitation Teamwork Training in Postgraduate Year Doctors and Nurses

NCT ID: NCT05302414

Last Updated: 2024-11-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-07

Study Completion Date

2022-12-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is challenging for healthcare team to manage emergency patient effectively. Most of these critical patients have medical conditions and need complex medical managements. Research findings have shown that poor healthcare teamwork would result in poor communication, missing information, and insufficient situation monitoring and thus compromise patient safety. Simulation has been proved as an effective method to develop teamwork competency. However, comparing to traditional training model, simulation requires more resources such as funding, spaces, time, administration staffs, schedule, facilitators, and equipment. It would not be easy to delivery in various professional departments. Game-based learning was a known effective and learner-centered learning model which required less resources. Researchers have shown that game-based learning has higher acceptance for the learners and can improve learners' knowledge, attitude, motivation, and performance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the learning effectiveness of resuscitation teamwork training of board game-based learning, simulation-based learning and lecture-based learning in PGY doctors and nurses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a prospective, longitudinal, and randomized controlled trial design. A total number of 180 PGY doctors and nurses will be enrolled from a teaching hospital in northern Taipei City. They will be randomized into board game-based learning group, simulation-based learning group, and lecture-based learning group. Three groups will receive "Emergency Medical Response Teamwork" training and all of these contents were developed according to America Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and ECC and TeamSTEPPS curriculum from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. We will collect the professional demography, the professional medical knowledge for medical management, the concept of knowledge for teamwork, team performance, team attitude, medical management, course survey, and cognitive load scales. We will compare the learning effectiveness between three groups in pretest, posttest, and three-months follow up. Statistical methods used included descriptive and inferential statistics, χ2 chi-square tests, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Friedman test, Wilcoxon test, generalized estimating equations, and text mining.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Care Team

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

three arms
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
two assessors using video to evaluate outcomes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Board game-based learning (experience group-I)

The team of PGY doctors and nurses receive training in resuscitation teamwork skills through a board game-based teaching approach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Board game-based learning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The team of PGY doctors and nurses received 3 hours training intervention in resuscitation teamwork skills through a board game-based teaching approach.

Simulation-based learning (experience group-II)

The team of PGY doctors and nurses receive training in resuscitation teamwork skills through a simulation-based teaching approach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simulation-based learning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The team of PGY doctors and nurses received 3 hours training intervention in resuscitation teamwork skills through a simulation-based teaching approach.

Lecture-based learning (control group)

The team of PGY doctors and nurses receive training in resuscitation teamwork skills through an interactive lecture-based learning approach.

Group Type OTHER

Lecture-based learning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The team of PGY doctors and nurses received 3 hours training intervention in resuscitation teamwork skills through an interactive lecture-based approach.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Board game-based learning

The team of PGY doctors and nurses received 3 hours training intervention in resuscitation teamwork skills through a board game-based teaching approach.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Simulation-based learning

The team of PGY doctors and nurses received 3 hours training intervention in resuscitation teamwork skills through a simulation-based teaching approach.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Lecture-based learning

The team of PGY doctors and nurses received 3 hours training intervention in resuscitation teamwork skills through an interactive lecture-based approach.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

experience group-I experience group-II control group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Postgraduate Year doctors who is 20 years old and work in primary care.
2. Postgraduate Year nurses who is 20 years old and work in primary care

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participant do not work in primary care provide.
2. Healthcare provider do not delivery in relative adult care department, such as pediatric department, obstetrics department, and psychiatry department so on.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Medical University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jen-Chieh Wu

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Taipei Medical University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jen-Chieh Wu

New Taipei City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aboalshamat K, Khayat A, Halwani R, Bitan A, Alansari R. The effects of gamification on antimicrobial resistance knowledge and its relationship to dentistry in Saudi Arabia: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020 May 13;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08806-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32404076 (View on PubMed)

Al-Ghareeb AZ, Cooper SJ. Barriers and enablers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation manikins in nurse education: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26323885 (View on PubMed)

Buijs-Spanjers KR, Harmsen A, Hegge HH, Spook JE, de Rooij SE, Jaarsma DADC. The influence of a serious game's narrative on students' attitudes and learning experiences regarding delirium: an interview study. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02210-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32873285 (View on PubMed)

Capella J, Smith S, Philp A, Putnam T, Gilbert C, Fry W, Harvey E, Wright A, Henderson K, Baker D, Ranson S, Remine S. Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients. J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21156305 (View on PubMed)

Fernandez R, Kozlowski SW, Shapiro MJ, Salas E. Toward a definition of teamwork in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1104-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00250.x. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18828831 (View on PubMed)

Eddy K, Jordan Z, Stephenson M. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27532314 (View on PubMed)

Cutumisu M, Patel SD, Brown MRG, Fray C, von Hauff P, Jeffery T, Schmolzer GM. RETAIN: A Board Game That Improves Neonatal Resuscitation Knowledge Retention. Front Pediatr. 2019 Jan 31;7:13. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00013. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30766862 (View on PubMed)

Malmstrom B, Nohlert E, Ewald U, Widarsson M. Simulation-based team training improved the self-assessed ability of physicians, nurses and midwives to perform neonatal resuscitation. Acta Paediatr. 2017 Aug;106(8):1273-1279. doi: 10.1111/apa.13861. Epub 2017 May 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28370414 (View on PubMed)

McEwan D, Ruissen GR, Eys MA, Zumbo BD, Beauchamp MR. The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169604. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28085922 (View on PubMed)

Finer NN, Rich W. Neonatal resuscitation: toward improved performance. Resuscitation. 2002 Apr;53(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00494-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11947979 (View on PubMed)

Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, Perkins GD, Soar J, Truhlar A, Wyllie J, Zideman DA; ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:1-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Oct 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26477410 (View on PubMed)

Rosqvist E, Lauritsalo S, Paloneva J. Short 2-H in Situ Trauma Team Simulation Training Effectively Improves Non-Technical Skills of Hospital Trauma Teams. Scand J Surg. 2019 Jun;108(2):117-123. doi: 10.1177/1457496918789006. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30027817 (View on PubMed)

Sawyer T, Laubach VA, Hudak J, Yamamura K, Pocrnich A. Improvements in teamwork during neonatal resuscitation after interprofessional TeamSTEPPS training. Neonatal Netw. 2013 Jan-Feb;32(1):26-33. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.32.1.26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23318204 (View on PubMed)

Truta TS, Boeriu CM, Copotoiu SM, Petrisor M, Turucz E, Vatau D, Lazarovici M. Improving nontechnical skills of an interprofessional emergency medical team through a one day crisis resource management training. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(32):e11828. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011828.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30095658 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N202201126

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High-Fidelity Simulation
NCT06935773 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA