Different Re-training Durations in BLS Training Among Non-Professionals

NCT ID: NCT06867653

Last Updated: 2025-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous studies on compression-only CPR and AED training for the general public have primarily focused on the optimal retraining interval. However, the impact of different retraining durations remains unclear. This study explores how varying practice durations in Basic Life Support (BLS) training affect BLS performance among non-professionals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, participants first underwent compression-only CPR and AED training. Before training, they completed a questionnaire on their perspectives on BLS retraining and basic demographic information. Knowledge tests, skill assessments, and attitude and confidence questionnaires were conducted both before and after training. During the skill assessment, two cameras recorded the process from different angles: one positioned from the feet towards the head of the manikin and the other from the left chest towards the right chest. Instructors, blinded to group allocation, later reviewed the recordings and assessed participants' performance using an evaluation form. Additionally, chest compressions were recorded using a computerized manikin (SkillReporter Resusci AnneĀ®, Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway).

Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups based on different retraining durations:

1. 45-minute retraining sessions
2. 60-minute retraining sessions
3. 75-minute retraining sessions

All three groups underwent skill assessments and knowledge tests every three months before their respective retraining sessions. The retraining skill assessments followed the same procedure as the initial training. Each retraining session began with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice. Each participant practiced for approximately five minutes per cycle, which included two minutes of chest compressions, one minute of AED application, one minute of feedback, and one minute for role-switching. Based on this structure, participants in the 45-minute group completed two practice cycles, those in the 60-minute group completed three cycles, and those in the 75-minute group completed four cycles.

Both the initial training and retraining followed the American Heart Association (AHA) HeartsaverĀ® CPR+AED course guidelines, with a participant-to-manikin ratio of 3:1 and a maximum of six participants per instructor. One year after the initial training, before the final skill assessment, participants completed the knowledge test and the attitude and confidence questionnaire. After the final skill assessment, they completed the CPR retraining perspectives questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Education Curriculum

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Three-armed randomized controlled Trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
During the skill assessment, two cameras recorded the process from different angles: one positioned from the feet towards the head of the manikin and the other from the left chest towards the right chest. Instructors, blinded to group allocation, later reviewed the recordings and assessed participants' performance using an evaluation form.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

45-minute retraining

45-minute retraining sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Retraining

Intervention Type OTHER

Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice

60-minute retraining

60-minute retraining sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Retraining

Intervention Type OTHER

Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice

75-minute retraining

75-minute retraining sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Retraining

Intervention Type OTHER

Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Retraining

Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>=18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects whose physical condition is unsuitable for the CPR training, such as those unable to squat, extend their arms fully, or individuals who are blind or deaf.
* Healthcare professionals and students majoring in healthcare-related fields.
* Individuals unwilling to sign the informed consent form
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming-Ju Hsieh, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shu-Ting Chen

Role: CONTACT

886223123456 ext. 265632

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ming-Ju Hsieh, MD, PhD

Role: primary

886223123456 ext. 265632

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202007002RINB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.