Different Re-training Durations in BLS Training Among Non-Professionals
NCT ID: NCT06867653
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-01
2027-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Application of Intermittent Training in Clinical Skills Simulation Training
NCT07239531
Does Contextual Interference Improve Retention of Basic Life Support Skills? A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02381093
Early or Late Booster in Basic Life Support for Health Care Professionals
NCT03893253
The Learning Outcome of Resuscitation Teamwork Training in Postgraduate Year Doctors and Nurses
NCT05302414
The Learning Effect of Applying Diversified Teaching in Emergency Injury Classification -Taking the Emergency Nurse of a Regional Hospital in Yunlin County as an Example
NCT06332586
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups based on different retraining durations:
1. 45-minute retraining sessions
2. 60-minute retraining sessions
3. 75-minute retraining sessions
All three groups underwent skill assessments and knowledge tests every three months before their respective retraining sessions. The retraining skill assessments followed the same procedure as the initial training. Each retraining session began with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice. Each participant practiced for approximately five minutes per cycle, which included two minutes of chest compressions, one minute of AED application, one minute of feedback, and one minute for role-switching. Based on this structure, participants in the 45-minute group completed two practice cycles, those in the 60-minute group completed three cycles, and those in the 75-minute group completed four cycles.
Both the initial training and retraining followed the American Heart Association (AHA) HeartsaverĀ® CPR+AED course guidelines, with a participant-to-manikin ratio of 3:1 and a maximum of six participants per instructor. One year after the initial training, before the final skill assessment, participants completed the knowledge test and the attitude and confidence questionnaire. After the final skill assessment, they completed the CPR retraining perspectives questionnaire.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
45-minute retraining
45-minute retraining sessions
Retraining
Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice
60-minute retraining
60-minute retraining sessions
Retraining
Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice
75-minute retraining
75-minute retraining sessions
Retraining
Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retraining
Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Healthcare professionals and students majoring in healthcare-related fields.
* Individuals unwilling to sign the informed consent form
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ming-Ju Hsieh, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202007002RINB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.