The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.
NCT ID: NCT06624449
Last Updated: 2024-11-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-29
2024-03-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study aims to:
* Identify the effect of hot versus cold debriefing in BLS training for nursing students.
* Identify which debriefing method students prefer.
Researchers will compare the two debriefing methods. Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned (by flipping a coin) to either hot or cold debriefing.
* Take part in a simulation about Basic Life Support.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aims/Hypothesis Specific aim 1: Identify the efficacy of cold versus hot debriefing in BLS training for undergraduate nursing students\' BLS competence.
Hypothesis 1a: In both cold and hot debriefing groups, there is a significant difference in the BLS competence of undergraduate nursing students between pre-intervention and post-intervention.
Hypothesis 1b: Undergraduate nursing students who receive cold debriefing will show greater BLS competence than those who receive hot debriefing. Our approach to testing the aim is to conduct an experimental design study.
Specific aim 2: Assess the impact of hot and cold debriefing on undergraduate nursing students\' debriefing experience.
Hypothesis 2: Undergraduate nursing students who receive cold debriefing will show greater debriefing experience scores than those who receive hot debriefing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cold Debriefing
The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Cold debriefing
Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Hot Debriefing
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Hot Debriefing
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cold debriefing
Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Hot Debriefing
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cincinnati
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fahad Alanezi
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fahad Alanezi, PhD Candidate, MSc, BSN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cincinnati
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Of Cincinnati College of Nursing
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Reed, S. J. (2012). Debriefing experience scale: Development of a tool to evaluate the student learning experience in debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(6), e211-e217.
Meguerdichian M, Bajaj K, Ivanhoe R, Lin Y, Sloma A, de Roche A, Altonen B, Bentley S, Cheng A, Walker K. Impact of the PEARLS Healthcare Debriefing cognitive aid on facilitator cognitive load, workload, and debriefing quality: a pilot study. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Dec 12;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00236-x.
Ha EH. Effects of hot and cold debriefing in simulation with case-based learning. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2021 Feb 26:e12410. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12410. Online ahead of print.
Kessler DO, Cheng A, Mullan PC. Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: a practical guide. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;65(6):690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Couper K, Perkins GD. Debriefing after resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Jun;19(3):188-94. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835f58aa.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-0423
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id