Effect of the Use of a Visual Feedback Device in RCP Trainings
NCT ID: NCT04338490
Last Updated: 2020-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
209 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-01
2019-11-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Comparison of the Two Simulators for ACLS Training
NCT05001659
Comparison of Different Automated External Defibrillation (AED) Training Methods
NCT00932906
Physicians in Training and Critical Care Nurses Performance in Medical Code Events: Effect of Simulation-Based Training
NCT02707185
Crisis Resource Management Improvement Through Intellectual Questioning of Authority
NCT03707964
Metric-based Feedback Training for the Acquisition of Sonographic Skills
NCT02976623
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Feedback mannequim
The intervention group received rcp training with their performance being evaluated in real time so that they could correct themselves
Control
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Feedback mannequim
The intervention group received rcp training with their performance being evaluated in real time so that they could correct themselves
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carina Trindade de Castro
Principal researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juarez Dr Neuhaus Barbisan
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, Gwinnutt C, Parrott F, Power S, Harrison DA, Nixon E, Rowan K; National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
Austin AL, Spalding CN, Landa KN, Myer BR, Cure D, Smith JE, Platt G, King HC. A Randomized Control Trial of Cardiopulmonary Feedback Devices and Their Impact on Infant Chest Compression Quality: A Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Feb;36(2):e79-e84. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001312.
Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O'Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. No abstract available.
Choi B, Asselin N, Pettit CC, Dannecker M, Machan JT, Merck DL, Merck LH, Suner S, Williams KA, Jay GD, Kobayashi L. Simulation-based Randomized Comparative Assessment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Bundle Completion by Emergency Medical Service Teams Using Standard Life Support or an Experimental Automation-assisted Approach. Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):365-375. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000178.
Iskrzycki L, Smereka J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Barcala Furelos R, Abelarias Gomez C, Kaminska H, Wieczorek W, Szarpak L, Nadolny K, Galazkowski R, Ruetzler K, Ladny JR. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(3):574-579. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0255. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
Kirkbright S, Finn J, Tohira H, Bremner A, Jacobs I, Celenza A. Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials. Resuscitation. 2014 Apr;85(4):460-71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Simulation-based learning in continuing medical education: analysis of student and teacher perceptions of a Hospital in Rio de Janeiro
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5637/19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.