Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study
NCT ID: NCT03381443
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
428 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-12-02
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses
NCT03412032
Self-learning vs Instructor-led Learning in BLS
NCT03141528
Self-guided vs Traditional Instructor-led Learning for Medical Device Training
NCT05530382
The Comparison of the Two Simulators for ACLS Training
NCT05001659
Effect of the Use of a Visual Feedback Device in RCP Trainings
NCT04338490
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERC
all students assessed by the methods used by the European Resuscitation Council
different assessments
coded survey about NTS and assessment
AHA
all students assessed by the methods used by the American Heart Association
different assessments
coded survey about NTS and assessment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
different assessments
coded survey about NTS and assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Greif, Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Bern
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Bern
Bern, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ILS_assessment_2017/2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.