Impact of Unexpected Death in Simulation: Skill Retention, Stress and Emotions
NCT ID: NCT03441425
Last Updated: 2020-03-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-10
2018-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Learning Crisis Resource Management: Practicing Versus Observational Role in Simulation Training
NCT01653704
Does Instruction on Cognitive Aid Use Improve Performance and Retention of Skills?
NCT01646372
Performance and Stress During Full Scale Simulator Training
NCT00704470
Effects of the in Situ Simulation to Competencies in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Nursing Team.
NCT03626272
Resource Optimization in the Intensive Care Unit Setting
NCT04665505
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods After Institutional Research Ethics Board approval, 56 residents and fellows of different medical specialties will be randomized to either the intervention (unexpected death) or control (survive) group. Participants from both groups will have to individually manage a simulated cardiac arrest crisis. In the intervention group, the scenario will end by the death of the simulated patient, whilst in the control group the simulated patient will survive. Each participant will be immediately debriefed by a trained instructor. Three months later, skill retention will be assessed in a similar scenario. Crisis management performance of all scenarios will be rated by 2 blinded raters. Biological stress, cognitive appraisal, and emotions will be measured during both scenarios.
Implications The impact of simulated unexpected death on skill retention of residents and fellows will provide instructors with evidence to optimize scenario design and approach the role of stress and emotions in simulation-based education.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
The control group participants will complete a cardiac arrest simulation scenario on the first day in which the mannequin returns to spontaneous circulation at the end of the scenario. They will then complete a retention simulation session three months later.
No interventions assigned to this group
Unexpected death
The experimental group participants will complete a cardiac arrest simulation scenario on the first day in which the mannequin unexpectedly dies at the end of the scenario. They will then complete a retention simulation session three months later.
Unexpected death
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Unexpected death
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants are requested to refrain from physical strains, smoking, drinking caffeinated or low pH beverages and eating for at least one hour before enrollment
* Participants will be included between 11 AM and 8 PM, when cortisol levels are most stable
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sylvain Boet, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Ottawa Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20130171-01H
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.