Computer Debriefing and Screen-based Simulation

NCT ID: NCT03844009

Last Updated: 2021-08-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-07

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Debriefing after simulation plays a crucial role in student learning and medical practice. This paper focuses on impact of computer debriefing technique on knowledge retention of midwives during screen-based simulation of neonatal resuscitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Simulation, including screen-based simulation, is employed in medicine to enhance competency and improve care. It has been practiced for centuries in its primitive form as uses of wax Venus or obstetrics dolls to teaching anatomical knowledge or know-how/gestures. Many benefits come from simulations as the capacity to practiced procedures without any risk to the patient, the possibility of trainees to commit errors and learn from these errors, the repeatability of scenario that can be different or presented to learners many times, and then the opportunity to improved technical and non-technical skills among learners. Specifically, screen-based simulation has many advantages as portability (easy to move), distribution and replicability (usable by many learners at differences places in the world), repeatability (people not faced frequently in their regular practice), even be remotely usable. Screen-based simulation appears in literature to be a complement of mannequin simulation. Indeed, since last years the development of computer science has made it possible to create new kind of simulators in the medical field for the acquisition of knowledge, know-how and technical gestures, more realistic and interactively rich.

Debriefing is considered as a part of simulation-based training and cannot be separated of simulators. Debriefing improve professional practice, clinical skills and competences. It exists different debriefing methods: post simulation debriefing, in-simulation debriefing, verbal instructor debriefing, video-assisted instructor debriefing, self-debriefing or also multimedia debriefing. However, debriefing is considered by many as a communication between student/learner and teacher, after a situation (e.g. simulation), and about this experience. It is not just a feedback on performance but also a communication process about the impact of the experience or performance explanation.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of a computer integrated debriefing of technical and non-technical skills on retention and performance of neonatal resuscitation management by trainee's midwives.

Thirty student in midwifery in fourth year will participate. The study protocol is the following:

Baseline knowledge questionnaire, randomization of the participants. Day one: Tutorial of the simulator, First scenario (+/- debriefing depending of the allocation group), second scenario (+/- debriefing depending of the allocation group).

Day two (two month later): knowledge questionnaire, tutorial of the simulator, one scenario (+/- debriefing depending of the allocation group).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Computer Simulation Neonatal Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized controlled study comparing two groups, one intervention group (debriefing) and one control group (no debriefing)
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcomes assessor (questionnaire) was blinded of the allocation group of the participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Debriefing

Participant's of the debriefing group had a computer integrated debriefing at the end of each scenario of the computer-based simulator

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer integrated debriefing

Intervention Type OTHER

At the end of each computer-based simulation, the participant had a computer integrated debriefing of his performance during the neonatal resuscitation simulation and a debriefing based on an auto-evaluation of his non-technical skills.

No debriefing

Participant's of the debriefing group had no computer integrated debriefing at the end of each scenario of the computer-based simulator

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer integrated debriefing

At the end of each computer-based simulation, the participant had a computer integrated debriefing of his performance during the neonatal resuscitation simulation and a debriefing based on an auto-evaluation of his non-technical skills.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Student in midwifery in fourth year in france (penultimate year of the midwifery studies)

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ilumens

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daphne Michelet

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antoine Tesnière, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ilumens

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ilumens, Paris Descartes University

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van der Heide PA, van Toledo-Eppinga L, van der Heide M, van der Lee JH. Assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills: a reliable and valid scoring system. Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16987590 (View on PubMed)

Donoghue A, Nishisaki A, Sutton R, Hales R, Boulet J. Reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for clinical performance during Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation scenarios. Resuscitation. 2010 Mar;81(3):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20047787 (View on PubMed)

Michelet D, Barre J, Truchot J, Piot MA, Cabon P, Tesniere A. Effect of Computer Debriefing on Acquisition and Retention of Learning After Screen-Based Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Aug 11;8(3):e18633. doi: 10.2196/18633.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32780021 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RNN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.