Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient Assessment, and Anxiety and Self-Confidence With Clinical Decision Making in Auscultation Skills With Simulation
NCT05668273
Effects of Standard Patient Simulation Method in Communication With Intensive Care Patients
NCT05802823
High Fidelity Simulation and Virtual Reality and Nursing Students
NCT06091449
The Effect of Simulation-Based Experience on Nursing Students
NCT05974891
Blended Learning to Enhance Elderly Communication Skills in Nursing Students and New Nurses
NCT07026136
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
The students involved in the intervention group were divided into subgroups, and the simulation was carried out using standardized patients. Each subgroup consisted of two students. Students were asked to practice supine and lateral recumbent positions in each scenario.
Standard patient simulation model
Nursing students were trained with a standard patient simulation model for position and communication skills education.
Control
The students in the control group were divided into subgroups and practised the supine position and the lateral recumbent position with a high-fidelity manikin. Each subgroup consisted of two students. The applications lasted 5-10 minutes for each group, and after the applications, the debriefing phase was conducted, which lasted 20 minutes.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard patient simulation model
Nursing students were trained with a standard patient simulation model for position and communication skills education.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* First-year nursing students
* Not have training in simulation
18 Years
26 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sakarya University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
özlem doğu
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Şengül ÜZEN CURA, Doctorate
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ozlem Dogu
Sakarya, Serdivan, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berman, A.,Snyder, S., &Frandsen, G. (2016). Fundamentals of nursing: concept, process, andpractice (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Potter, P.A., Perry, A.G., &Stockert, P.A. Fundamentals of nursing(10, revised ed.). (2021). St. Louis:Elsevier.
Wilfong DN, Falsetti DJ, McKinnon JL, Daniel LH, Wan QC. The effects of virtual intravenous and patient simulator training compared to the traditional approach of teaching nurses: a research project on peripheral i.v. catheter insertion. J Infus Nurs. 2011 Jan-Feb;34(1):55-62. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31820219e2.
McWilliams LA, Malecha A. Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators. Nurs Res Pract. 2017;2017:4685157. doi: 10.1155/2017/4685157. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
Vidal VL, Ohaeri BM, John P, Helen D. Virtual reality and the traditional method for phlebotomy training among college of nursing students in Kuwait: implications for nursing education and practice. J Infus Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;36(5):349-55. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e318243172f.
Ignacio J, Dolmans D, Scherpbier A, Rethans JJ, Chan S, Liaw SY. Comparison of standardized patients with high-fidelity simulators for managing stress and improving performance in clinical deterioration: A mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):1161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 May 23.
Uzen Cura S, Kocatepe V, Yildirim D, Kucukakgun H, Atay S, Unver V. Examining Knowledge, Skill, Stress, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence Levels of Nursing Students in Three Different Simulation Modalities. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Aug;14(3):158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Doolen J, Giddings M, Johnson M, Guizado de Nathan G, O Badia L. An evaluation of mental health simulation with standardized patients. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014 Mar 12;11:/j/ijnes.2014.11.issue-1/ijnes-2013-0075/ijnes-2013-0075.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0075.
Quail M, Brundage SB, Spitalnick J, Allen PJ, Beilby J. Student self-reported communication skills, knowledge and confidence across standardised patient, virtual and traditional clinical learning environments. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 27;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0577-5.
Olaussen C, Heggdal K, Tvedt CR. Elements in scenario-based simulation associated with nursing students' self-confidence and satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2019 Sep 27;7(1):170-179. doi: 10.1002/nop2.375. eCollection 2020 Jan.
MacLean S, Kelly M, Geddes F, Della P. Use of simulated patients to develop communication skills in nursing education: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jan;48:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Cabanero-Martinez MJ, Garcia-Sanjuan S, Escribano S, Fernandez-Alcantara M, Martinez-Riera JR, Julia-Sanchis R. Mixed-method study on the satisfaction of a high-fidelity simulation program in a sample of nursing-degree students. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104858. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104858. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
A Technological Step in Nursing Education: Intramuscular Injection ventro-sim
Using standardized patients to improve the hygiene care skills of first-year nursing students: A randomized controlled trial
Effects of Simulation-based Education on Communication Skill and Clinical Competence in Maternity Nursing Practicum
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Comparison Simulation Models
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.