Effect of Reflective Thinking Method on Ethical Decision Making, Professional Values and Compassion Level
NCT ID: NCT06675669
Last Updated: 2024-11-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-22
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
H1.1. There is a difference in ethical decision-making average scores between students who were applied the reflection method in ethics education and students in the control group.
H1.2. There is a difference in professional values average scores between students who were applied the reflection method in ethics education and students in the control group.
H1.3. There is a difference in compassion average scores between students who were applied the reflection method in ethics education and students in the control group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Concept Map Use in Nursing Practice
NCT06451991
Effect of Critical Thinking Disposition Program on Developing Reflective Thinking and Motivation to Learn Among Nursing Students
NCT07334158
The Effectiveness of Blended and Problem-based Learning to Improve the Competence of Geriatric Nursing Students
NCT05290909
Emotion Regulation Training, Nursing Student, and Alexithymia
NCT06701097
Reflective Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation Training to Enhance Nursing Students' Self-Awareness, Understanding, and Regulation
NCT06760962
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Reflective thinking
Discussion sessions will be held once a week for 7 weeks within the scope of the Professional Ethics Course for the students in the intervention group. For the discussion sessions, the students will be divided into 4 groups of 10-11 people. Separate 1-hour discussion sessions will be held with each group.
A training session will be held with the students in the intervention group in the first week (November 22,2024). In this session; the researchers will inform the students about the reflective thinking technique. In the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th weeks (January 03, 2025), the students will come to class by writing an event/situation they encountered during their hospital internship in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing course, which they are currently doing clinical practice. During the class hour, the researcher will determine one of the events/situations written by the students and will discuss it in the group.Follow-up data will be collected after 3 months (March 31,2025).
Reflective thinking method
It will be applied to students in the initiative group for 1 hour per week for 7 weeks.
Control
No application will be made to the students in the control group. These students will be given standard education for 7 weeks (Between November 22, 2024 and January 03, 2025).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reflective thinking method
It will be applied to students in the initiative group for 1 hour per week for 7 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being registered in the Professional Ethics course
* Having participated in the theoretical part of the Professional Ethics course
* Being volunteering to participate in the research
Exclusion Criteria
* Working as a healthcare professional
* Being a foreign national
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Necmettin Erbakan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Serpil SU
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NecErbakanU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.