Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score

NCT ID: NCT01633606

Last Updated: 2014-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to develop a screening instrument, based on the nursing activities score, by which we can distinguish medium care patients from the intensive care patients in terms of nurse staffing.

The main study question is: What is the most discriminative NAS cut off for medium care patient?

Each nursing shift the NAS and TISS 28 scores will be calculated for each patient who is admitted to the 8 participating units.

Nurses will be asked to answer 3 questions (see detailed description here under)at the end of their working shift concerning each patient appointed to them.

Each morning medical staff and head nurses will be asked 2 questions (see detailed description here under) for concerning patient admitted to there ward.

In order to determine the NAS cut off for medium care patient, all morning questionnaire scores will be compared to the NAS an TISS28 scores of that same morning.

Secondary study questions are:

* Can NAS score based on one nursing shift predict the severity of care in the subsequent nursing shift?
* Is there a difference in appreciation of severity of care between nurses, head nurses and medical staff?
* Which variables influence the perception of severity of care?
* How does NAS relate to TISS28, APACHE and NEMS?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nursing questionnaire:

1. How many beds were appointed to you?

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
2. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally?

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. \>4
3. This patients' burden of care corresponds to:

1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care
2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care
3. A medium care patient

medical staff and head nurse questionaire:

1. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally?

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. \>4
2. This patients' burden of care corresponds to?

1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care
2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care
3. A medium care patient

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acute patients

Patients admitted to the surgical and general ICU (including burn unit), to the coronary care unit, to the emergency department high care zone, to the medical ICU, to the medical medium care unit

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* admission to one of the 9 critical area's
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Greet Van den Berghe

professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Greet Van den Berghe, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Catholic University Leuven

Karen Decock, RS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NAS-ICU-2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ovice Nurse Transition Shock and Readiness
NCT07020208 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA