Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score
NCT ID: NCT01633606
Last Updated: 2014-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-02-28
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main study question is: What is the most discriminative NAS cut off for medium care patient?
Each nursing shift the NAS and TISS 28 scores will be calculated for each patient who is admitted to the 8 participating units.
Nurses will be asked to answer 3 questions (see detailed description here under)at the end of their working shift concerning each patient appointed to them.
Each morning medical staff and head nurses will be asked 2 questions (see detailed description here under) for concerning patient admitted to there ward.
In order to determine the NAS cut off for medium care patient, all morning questionnaire scores will be compared to the NAS an TISS28 scores of that same morning.
Secondary study questions are:
* Can NAS score based on one nursing shift predict the severity of care in the subsequent nursing shift?
* Is there a difference in appreciation of severity of care between nurses, head nurses and medical staff?
* Which variables influence the perception of severity of care?
* How does NAS relate to TISS28, APACHE and NEMS?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evalution of Nurse's Abilities in ICU Setting
NCT05791214
Developing a Standardized Learning Curve
NCT02830971
The Effect of Concept Map Use in Nursing Practice
NCT06451991
High Fidelity Simulation-based Learning Approach in Maternal and Infant Care
NCT06722248
Evaluation of an E-learning Program for Assessing Pressure Ulcer Risk and Pressure Ulcer Classification - a Pilot Study
NCT01567410
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. How many beds were appointed to you?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
2. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. \>4
3. This patients' burden of care corresponds to:
1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care
2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care
3. A medium care patient
medical staff and head nurse questionaire:
1. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. \>4
2. This patients' burden of care corresponds to?
1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care
2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care
3. A medium care patient
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acute patients
Patients admitted to the surgical and general ICU (including burn unit), to the coronary care unit, to the emergency department high care zone, to the medical ICU, to the medical medium care unit
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Greet Van den Berghe
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Greet Van den Berghe, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Catholic University Leuven
Karen Decock, RS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NAS-ICU-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.