Potential Optimization Training in Simulation.

NCT ID: NCT02926599

Last Updated: 2018-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

118 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur and planification of team resources and priority in the treatment strategy may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare individual and team performances with or without an optimization personal potential training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators aim to compare the individual and team performances for resident who were taught personal optimization skills (positive reinforcement, personalized psycho-physiological relaxation, mental rehearsal) and those who didn't.

The investigators are going to compare groups of anesthesiology residents going through same scenarios of simulated critical events in high fidelity simulation session. Scenarios will be recorded to be analyzed by 2 reviewers independently. A specific checklist of appropriate treatment and a non technical skill checklist will be use to cote team performance (OTTAWA and TEAM scales). Stress of the participants will be assessed by visual analogic scale of participants anxiety and stress. The two groups will be compare to see if improvement in team performance is associated with the intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Personal Optimization Training

Personal Optimization Training such as positive reinforcement, personalized psycho-physiological relaxation and mental rehearsal (total 5 hours a few weeks before the simulation).

Having 2 min to focus on techniques they were trained, after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personal Optimization Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control

No particular training.

Screening of normal labs results during 2 min, after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personal Optimization Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Anesthesiology and Intensive care resident in the simulation education curriculum

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate (written approval required)
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Claude Bernard University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lilot Marc

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Jacques, Lehot, PHD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

CLESS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CLESS

Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TOPCLESS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.