Performance and Team Pre-critical Staff Before Critical Event in High Fidelity Simulation for Anesthesiology Residents

NCT ID: NCT02599584

Last Updated: 2020-03-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 44 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2015-11-30
• Study Completion Date: 2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur and plannification of team resources and priority in the treatment strategy may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a liberal preparation team staff of 4 min, suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts.

Detailed Description

High fidelity simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur, plannification of team resources, priority in the treatment strategy and effective communication within the team, may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a preparation team staff of 4 min. This staff will be suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts. The investigators are going to compare groups of anesthesiology residents going through same scenarios of simulated critical events in high fidelity simulation session. Scenarios will be recorded to be analyzed by 2 reviewers independantly. A checklist of appropriate treatment and a non technical skill checklist will be use to cote team performance. Stress of the participants will be assessed by visual analogic scale of participants anxiety and stress. the two groups (preparation staff or no preparation staff) will be compare to see if improvement in team performance is associated with the intervention.

Conditions

Healthy

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: OTHER
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

precritical staff

4 min of precritical team staff for anticipation of risk and role attribution during the critical events if they occur. athe staff will take place after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

precritical staff

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

free pre critical scenario team staff

control

screening of normal labs results during 4 min, after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

precritical staff

free pre critical scenario team staff

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Anesthesiology resident in the education simulation curriculum

Exclusion Criteria

• no verbal consent

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Claude Bernard University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Lilot Marc

MD

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

jean jacques lehot, PHD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

CLESS

Locations

CLESS

Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Countries

France

Other Identifiers

CLESS 2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id