Using a Nurse-Led Communication Strategy for Surrogates in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT ID: NCT03770481
Last Updated: 2024-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-01
2021-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Written Communication in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT05636371
Simulation Training of Closed-Loop Communication (CLC)
NCT03600298
Effects of Standard Patient Simulation Method in Communication With Intensive Care Patients
NCT05802823
Proactive Ethics Intervention to Improve Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Care
NCT00996814
Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies
NCT04244565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Assess the NLCS' feasibility
Hypothesis: No significant differences will be observed in recruitment and attrition between NLCS intervention and control groups.
Approach: Determine rates of enrollment and drop-outs between groups.
nurse-led communication strategy
Nurse-led communication strategy (NLCS) applies 'COMFORT' framework that research nurses use the framework to engage one communication session per day with surrogates and two discussions with bedside nurses or attending physician during the ICU stay.
Assess the NLCS' acceptability
Hypothesis: More surrogates agree that the NLCS is suitable, appropriate, effective and willing to adhere versus treatment as usual (TAU) communication.
Approach: Assess outcome using the validated instrument, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8).
nurse-led communication strategy
Nurse-led communication strategy (NLCS) applies 'COMFORT' framework that research nurses use the framework to engage one communication session per day with surrogates and two discussions with bedside nurses or attending physician during the ICU stay.
Assess the NLCS' preliminary effects
Hypothesis: NLCS improves communication and decreases surrogates' psychological distress (e.g., anxiety and depression) Approach: Compare pre- and post-intervention scores of the Quality of Communication (QOC) questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) between intervention and control groups.
nurse-led communication strategy
Nurse-led communication strategy (NLCS) applies 'COMFORT' framework that research nurses use the framework to engage one communication session per day with surrogates and two discussions with bedside nurses or attending physician during the ICU stay.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nurse-led communication strategy
Nurse-led communication strategy (NLCS) applies 'COMFORT' framework that research nurses use the framework to engage one communication session per day with surrogates and two discussions with bedside nurses or attending physician during the ICU stay.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. in the ICU for \> 24 hours
3. Mechanically ventilated within 24 hours of ICU admission
4. Having an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV ICU mortality prediction ≥ 20%
* Surrogates
1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. A legal New York State healthcare proxy documentation or A Family Health Care Decision Act (FHCDA) consent
Exclusion Criteria
1. Decease or discharge from ICU within 24 hours
2. Mechanically ventilated after 24 hours of ICU stay
3. Able to communicate and make own decision
4. Lack of a legal surrogate/proxy decision-maker to consent for patient participation
* Surrogates
1. Lack of legal surrogate documentation
2. Not able to complete consent process and questionnaires in English
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
State University of New York at Buffalo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chiahui Chen
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Buffalo General Medical Center
Buffalo, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ryan RE, Connolly M, Bradford NK, Henderson S, Herbert A, Schonfeld L, Young J, Bothroyd JI, Henderson A. Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00008241
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.