The Embedded Participant During High-fidelity Simulation
NCT ID: NCT04898660
Last Updated: 2022-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
340 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-01
2022-11-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this context, simulation instructor training have been implemented in recent years, where many subjects are addressed, such as the main principles of pedagogy, the integration of simulation, the construction of a scenario, briefing and debriefing.
However, scenario facilitation, in particular the role of the embedded participant (EP), is only vaguely discussed. The EP of a high-fidelity simulation session plays a very important role in driving the scenario. Indeed, he/she guides the learner in order to achieve all the educational objectives set by the main instructor of the scenario. He/she also manages unexpected behavior and possible technical issues that may arise. Finally, the EP supervises the physical and psychological risks inherent in the simulation in order to maintain a safe environment.
All of these key roles suggest that the EP can influence the performance of the learners. Little is known about the relationship between Facilitation and Learner Performance.
In this observational study, investigators aim to explore the influence of the embedded participant on learners' technical and non-technical performances during high-fidelity simulation by analysing previously recorded sessions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Learning Outcomes Between the Roles of Learner During an Immersive Simulation
NCT02804425
Potential Optimization Training in Simulation.
NCT02926599
Performance and Team Pre-critical Staff Before Critical Event in High Fidelity Simulation for Anesthesiology Residents
NCT02599584
Paradigm Shift in Medical Education: Applications of High-Fidelity Simulation, Teamwork Model Development, and Concept of Flipped Classroom in Innovation and Revolution of Resuscitation Training
NCT02149693
Interprofessional Education of Medical Students Using Medical Simulation
NCT05817682
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two investigators will independently evaluate the performance of HFS by video record:
* technical performance on tables pre-established by experienced instructors and based on international recommendations,
* non-technical performances, assessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consent for recording
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Claude Bernard University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lilot Marc
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
thomas rimmele, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Claude Bernard University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Claude Bernard University
Lyon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cooke JM, Rooney DM, Fernandez GL, Farley DR. Simulation center best practices: A review of ACS-accredited educational institutes' best practices, 2011 to present. Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):916-920. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
Paige JB, Graham L, Sittner B. Formal Training Efforts to Develop Simulation Educators: An Integrative Review. Simul Healthc. 2020 Aug;15(4):271-281. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000424.
Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Holzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, Thompson TM, Wallace A, Gliva-McConvey G. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP). Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Jun 27;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4. eCollection 2017.
Boyer TJ, Mitchell SA. Utilization of Embedded Simulation Personnel in Medical Simulation. 2023 Jul 24. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562294/
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAC1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.