Predicting Nurse Staffing Requirements From Routinely Collected Data
NCT ID: NCT06923943
Last Updated: 2025-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-05-01
2026-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Is it possible to predict nurse staffing requirements from routinely recorded data in hospital systems?
Researchers will ask nurses about their views of nurse staffing tools and what support they need for staffing decisions. They will analyse data from hospital IT systems.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score
NCT01633606
Working Shift Organization, Caregivers' Satisfaction and Quality of Life at Work, and Performance.
NCT03875521
Effects of a Sleep Education Program on the Health Status of Healthcare Workers Working 12-hour Alternating Day-night Shifts
NCT07326579
Resource Optimization in the Intensive Care Unit Setting
NCT04665505
Simulation to Assess Cognitive Workload and Task Load IndeX (TLX) Performance
NCT03175484
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: Develop a method to measure demand for nursing staff on hospital wards using routine data to help plan establishments (number of ward employees), monitor staffing adequacy in real-time, and inform safe and efficient deployment of staff.
Design: A retrospective observational study across wards providing acute adult somatic (i.e. not mental health) inpatient care in 5 general hospital Trusts, predicting nurse staffing requirements from routinely collected data and validating these predictions against patient and staffing adequacy outcomes. Algorithms will be developed according to user-centred design and by engaging with patients to understand experiences of hospital nurse staffing and implications for developing algorithms.
Workstream (WS) 1 Objective: understand what does/does not work for nurses and managers when using staffing tools, and incorporate this into algorithm design. Method: User-centred design approach comprising i) a national survey of staffing matrons and Chief Nursing Information Officers to find out how staffing tools are used and patient data availability/quality, ii) workshops with nurses and nursing managers to understand staffing decision support needs at different timepoints, iii) workshops with this group plus NHS IT managers and roster companies to discuss algorithm design considerations.
WS2 Objective: develop statistical/machine learning algorithms to estimate nurse staffing requirements from routinely available patient data. Method: Since there is no "gold standard" for measuring nurse staffing requirements, researchers will first replicate measurements from the SNCT, a patient acuity/dependency classification tool. They will develop alternative algorithms including replicating individual patient acuity/dependency classifications and replicating the staffing requirements for a whole ward. They will consider staffing decisions at different timepoints. Predictor variables will come from administrative and care plan data.
WS3 Objective: assess the validity of algorithms. Method: Researchers will fit regression models to investigate the associations between actual under/over-staffing relative to each candidate measure of staffing requirements and multiple outcomes. For this, they will use routine data extracted from hospital IT systems and a micro-survey of nurses to understand perceptions of staffing adequacy. They will test whether as staffing increases relative to a measure of staffing requirements, the risk of poor patient outcomes and perceptions that staffing is inadequate decreases. They will compare model fit against models with staffing requirements measured by the SNCT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
National survey
We will survey staffing matrons and Chief Nursing Information Officers in England to find out how staffing tools are used and the availability/quality of patient data in IT systems.
No interventions assigned to this group
Workshops
In workshops we will 1) ask nurses and managers what problems they have with current staffing systems and what would help, 2) discuss with nurses, NHS IT managers and IT system providers ideas for building our prediction algorithms into software products.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* nursing manager with safe staffing remit/IT remit. OR
* clinical nurse with experience of completing Safer Nursing Care Tool ratings. OR
* NHS IT manager with familiarity of hospital Trust's systems for storing patient data. OR
* representative of company who provide rostering or patient information system services to hospitals.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
OTHER
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
NHS England
OTHER_GOV
University of Southampton
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christina Saville
Dr.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIHR166784
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
346148
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
100780
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.