Predicting Nurse Staffing Requirements From Routinely Collected Data

NCT ID: NCT06923943

Last Updated: 2025-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to find out if the researchers can predict the number of nurses needed on hospital wards (units) from patient hospital data. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is it possible to predict nurse staffing requirements from routinely recorded data in hospital systems?

Researchers will ask nurses about their views of nurse staffing tools and what support they need for staffing decisions. They will analyse data from hospital IT systems.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Having enough nurses on hospital wards is vital for patient safety but planning for varying numbers and needs of patients is hard. Almost all acute NHS Trusts in England use the NICE-endorsed Safer Nursing Care Tool (SNCT) to guide staffing decisions. However, this approach is labour-intensive and necessitates the collection of data specifically to measure staffing requirements, not informed by data gathered for administration or care management.

Aim: Develop a method to measure demand for nursing staff on hospital wards using routine data to help plan establishments (number of ward employees), monitor staffing adequacy in real-time, and inform safe and efficient deployment of staff.

Design: A retrospective observational study across wards providing acute adult somatic (i.e. not mental health) inpatient care in 5 general hospital Trusts, predicting nurse staffing requirements from routinely collected data and validating these predictions against patient and staffing adequacy outcomes. Algorithms will be developed according to user-centred design and by engaging with patients to understand experiences of hospital nurse staffing and implications for developing algorithms.

Workstream (WS) 1 Objective: understand what does/does not work for nurses and managers when using staffing tools, and incorporate this into algorithm design. Method: User-centred design approach comprising i) a national survey of staffing matrons and Chief Nursing Information Officers to find out how staffing tools are used and patient data availability/quality, ii) workshops with nurses and nursing managers to understand staffing decision support needs at different timepoints, iii) workshops with this group plus NHS IT managers and roster companies to discuss algorithm design considerations.

WS2 Objective: develop statistical/machine learning algorithms to estimate nurse staffing requirements from routinely available patient data. Method: Since there is no "gold standard" for measuring nurse staffing requirements, researchers will first replicate measurements from the SNCT, a patient acuity/dependency classification tool. They will develop alternative algorithms including replicating individual patient acuity/dependency classifications and replicating the staffing requirements for a whole ward. They will consider staffing decisions at different timepoints. Predictor variables will come from administrative and care plan data.

WS3 Objective: assess the validity of algorithms. Method: Researchers will fit regression models to investigate the associations between actual under/over-staffing relative to each candidate measure of staffing requirements and multiple outcomes. For this, they will use routine data extracted from hospital IT systems and a micro-survey of nurses to understand perceptions of staffing adequacy. They will test whether as staffing increases relative to a measure of staffing requirements, the risk of poor patient outcomes and perceptions that staffing is inadequate decreases. They will compare model fit against models with staffing requirements measured by the SNCT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nursing Workload

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

National survey

We will survey staffing matrons and Chief Nursing Information Officers in England to find out how staffing tools are used and the availability/quality of patient data in IT systems.

No interventions assigned to this group

Workshops

In workshops we will 1) ask nurses and managers what problems they have with current staffing systems and what would help, 2) discuss with nurses, NHS IT managers and IT system providers ideas for building our prediction algorithms into software products.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* safe staffing lead/nurse with responsibility for safe staffing or CNIO/nurse with responsibility for IT/electronic records


* nursing manager with safe staffing remit/IT remit. OR
* clinical nurse with experience of completing Safer Nursing Care Tool ratings. OR
* NHS IT manager with familiarity of hospital Trust's systems for storing patient data. OR
* representative of company who provide rostering or patient information system services to hospitals.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS England

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southampton

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christina Saville

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIHR166784

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

346148

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

100780

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Shift Work Health Effects
NCT04813536 UNKNOWN
Ovice Nurse Transition Shock and Readiness
NCT07020208 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA