Virtual Reality Educational Intervention for Nursing Students' Day Surgery Patient Counselling: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Feasibility Study
NCT ID: NCT07305714
Last Updated: 2025-12-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-18
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Day surgery patients spend limited time in the hospital but need comprehensive information about their surgery, recovery, and self-care at home. Nurses must provide effective patient education within short timeframes, which creates unique challenges. Research shows that surgical patients consistently report needing more education than they currently receive, particularly about managing pain, recognizing complications, and knowing what to expect during recovery.
Traditional nursing education often lacks the patient's perspective and emotional context that characterize real clinical situations. Virtual reality simulation can address this gap by letting nursing students experience healthcare scenarios from the patient's viewpoint in a safe learning environment.
The CINDY (Counseling Intervention for Day Surgery) intervention uses 360-degree VR videos showing day surgery situations from the patient's perspective. Students can practice counseling skills and learn to understand patient concerns before working with actual patients.
This pilot feasibility study will include 60 nursing students from Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. Thirty students will receive the CINDY VR intervention alongside their regular education, while 30 students will receive only standard education. The study will run for approximately 6-7 months.
The primary goal is to test whether this VR approach is feasible and acceptable for nursing education. The study will measure:
* How successfully students can be recruited and retained
* Whether students complete the VR program as designed
* Student and educator satisfaction with the learning method
* Technical performance and usability of the VR platform
* Preliminary changes in student counseling competencies
Results will inform the design of a larger study to definitively test whether VR training improves nursing students' patient counseling skills. This research may help nursing programs better prepare students to provide high-quality patient education in day surgery settings.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The CINDY (Counseling Intervention for Day Surgery) educational intervention was systematically developed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex intervention development. The intervention addresses the recognized gap in nursing education regarding patient counseling competencies for day surgery settings, where reduced contact time requires highly effective communication skills.
INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT (MRC PHASE 1)
Following MRC Phase 1 guidelines, the intervention was co-designed through multidisciplinary collaboration with nursing educators, day surgery nurses, and nursing students. Stakeholder evaluation was conducted with nursing educators (n=6-8), day surgery nurses (n=6-8), and graduating nursing students (n=6-8), demonstrating excellent usability with a Post-System Usability Scale (P-SUS) score of 95.0/100 (scores ≥70 indicate good to excellent usability). Phase 1 results will be reported separately.
CURRENT STUDY (MRC PHASE 2)
This pilot feasibility study represents MRC Phase 2 (Feasibility and Piloting) and follows CONSORT extension guidelines for pilot and feasibility trials. The intervention is described according to the TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication) checklist to ensure comprehensive and replicable reporting.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a non-randomized pilot feasibility study employing a convergent mixed methods approach with parallel groups (intervention n=30, control n=30). The quasi-experimental design compares students receiving the CINDY VR intervention alongside standard perioperative nursing education with students receiving only standard education.
INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION
The CINDY intervention is a 90-minute VR-based educational program delivered through the ThingLink platform. The intervention was developed through a co-design process involving the principal investigator (nursing educator), a digital content expert, and an experienced day surgery nurse, ensuring both pedagogical soundness and clinical authenticity.
Students experience interactive 360-degree VR scenarios depicting day surgery patient journeys from admission through discharge, including preoperative preparation, postoperative recovery, and discharge counseling. The scenarios were filmed in authentic clinical settings and feature real patient perspectives and concerns. The intervention emphasizes patient perspective-taking, anxiety management strategies, and effective information provision techniques tailored to the time constraints of day surgery settings.
DATA COLLECTION
Mixed methods data collection occurs at three timepoints: baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 4-6 weeks post-intervention (T3). Quantitative measures include patient counseling competencies (OKO Scale), system usability (Post-System Usability Scale), and feasibility indicators (recruitment, retention, adherence, fidelity, acceptability). Qualitative data include semi-structured interviews with students, educators, and day surgery nurses. Intervention group focus group discussions use the TIDieR checklist components as a framework to systematically evaluate intervention delivery, materials, procedures, and fidelity.
PRIMARY OUTCOMES
As a pilot feasibility study, primary outcomes focus on feasibility indicators: recruitment success (≥70% eligible students enrolled), retention (≥80% complete all measurements), intervention adherence (≥75% complete full VR program), intervention fidelity (≥85% scenarios completed correctly), and acceptability (mean P-SUS score ≥70). These predetermined success criteria will inform decisions about proceeding to a definitive randomized controlled trial.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The study received ethics approval from Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences Ethics Committee. All participants provide written informed consent after receiving comprehensive study information. Participation is voluntary with the right to withdraw at any time without consequences to academic standing. Data are managed according to GDPR and Finnish data protection regulations.
SIGNIFICANCE
Results will inform the design and implementation of a future definitive trial to test intervention effectiveness. This research contributes to the evidence base for VR simulation in nursing education and addresses the urgent need for improved patient counseling training in day surgery settings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Nursing students (n=30) receive the CINDY virtual reality educational intervention (90 minutes, ThingLink platform) in addition to standard perioperative nursing education. The VR intervention includes interactive 360-degree scenarios showing day surgery patient journeys from the patient's perspective.
CINDY Virtual Reality Educational Intervention
The CINDY (Counseling Intervention for Day Surgery) is a 90-minute virtual reality-based educational program delivered through the ThingLink platform. The intervention features interactive 360-degree VR scenarios depicting day surgery patient journeys from admission through discharge, including preoperative preparation, postoperative recovery, and discharge counseling. The scenarios were co-designed by a nursing educator, digital content expert, and day surgery nurse, and filmed in authentic clinical settings. Students experience situations from the patient's perspective, focusing on patient anxiety management, effective information provision, and counseling techniques for time-limited day surgery settings.
Control Group
Nursing students (n=30) receive standard perioperative nursing education only, without the CINDY VR intervention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CINDY Virtual Reality Educational Intervention
The CINDY (Counseling Intervention for Day Surgery) is a 90-minute virtual reality-based educational program delivered through the ThingLink platform. The intervention features interactive 360-degree VR scenarios depicting day surgery patient journeys from admission through discharge, including preoperative preparation, postoperative recovery, and discharge counseling. The scenarios were co-designed by a nursing educator, digital content expert, and day surgery nurse, and filmed in authentic clinical settings. Students experience situations from the patient's perspective, focusing on patient anxiety management, effective information provision, and counseling techniques for time-limited day surgery settings.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provided written informed consent
* Basic digital literacy and ability to use computer/tablet devices
* Access to required technology (computer, tablet, or smartphone with internet connection)
* Willingness to participate in all study procedures including surveys and potential interviews
Exclusion Criteria
* History of motion sickness or documented intolerance to virtual reality environments
* Current or planned leave of absence during the study period that would prevent completion of all measurement timepoints
* Previous participation in CINDY intervention stakeholder evaluation (Phase 1)
* Inability to read and understand Finnish language study materials
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tampere University
OTHER
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Seinajoki University of Applied Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Terhi Voltti
Doctoral Candidate, Lecturer, MSc
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan AW, Michie S. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E, Petticrew M, Rycroft-Malone J, White M, Moore L. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ethics-20251108
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CINDY-2025-SEAMK
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id