Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-15
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To study surprise signals in the anterior insula, a brain structure where these signals have been very prominent, the investigators will employ an experiment with subjects who are under SEEG (stereoelectroencephalogram) recording, that is, recording from electrodes which have been surgically implanted in the brain. These recordings will be done as patients perform a task where they try to anticipate the movements of a target on a line in two different learning environments (conditions). The experimenters will then determine whether these signals reflect surprise relative to past engagement with the environment, or surprise that reveals that the agent no longer feels in control because uncertainty is not in line with the reference model. If evidence is consistent with the former, adaptation reflects traditional reinforcement and aims at optimizing behavior. If evidence instead is consistent with the latter, behavior is guided by a prior model (a reference model) and behavior is satisficing.
An fMRI study by d'Acremont and Bossaerts provides initial evidence that activation in the anterior insula supports the satisficing hypothesis, however it lacks the temporal granularity to completely rule out optimizing. In the current project, the investigators propose to use the higher time resolution of SEEG recordings to confirm these findings and reject the optimizing hypothesis.
Additionally, stimulations of the anterior insula during a subset of trials will be used to determine whether insular activation following surprise signals and preceding changes in behavior (learning) is merely correlational or in fact causal. Stimulation will allow us to determine to what extent the subjects' sense of control and subsequent behavior can be influenced in accordance with surprise-based modeling of behavior.
The cohort for this study will be patients with drug-resistant, focal epilepsy and who are hospitalized at the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG) for pre-surgical evaluation of their epilepsy using SEEG. The protocol will run in parallel with the patients' clinical procedures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Self-modulation of the Sense of Agency by Means of Real-time Neurofeedback
NCT05214833
Eye Movements and Visuo-spatial Perception
NCT03112408
Study of Attentional Disorders in Patients Suffering From Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.
NCT05530109
Changes in Attentional Control After a Focal Seizure.
NCT06466681
Electrophysiological Signatures of Distinct Working Memory Subprocesses That Predict Long-term Memory Success
NCT05892419
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Patients who suffer from potentially surgically remediable drug-resistant focal epilepsy and who require evaluation with intracranial stereo-EEG electrodes and have them implanted in the anterior insula.
N = 10
SEEG stimulation
Electrodes already implanted in patient's anterior insula will be stimulated below the patient-specific threshold at which a seizure was induced. This stimulations will coincide with certain trials in the adaptation task.
Adaptation task
Participants will perform a task that requires them to learn and correctly respond to outliers of two sorts; inconsequential outliers, which require no action, and outliers that are relevant to the course of stimuli and outcomes in future trials, requiring adaptive action.
Subclinical
Healthy individuals who match the clinical population in age and level of education.
N = 40
Adaptation task
Participants will perform a task that requires them to learn and correctly respond to outliers of two sorts; inconsequential outliers, which require no action, and outliers that are relevant to the course of stimuli and outcomes in future trials, requiring adaptive action.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SEEG stimulation
Electrodes already implanted in patient's anterior insula will be stimulated below the patient-specific threshold at which a seizure was induced. This stimulations will coincide with certain trials in the adaptation task.
Adaptation task
Participants will perform a task that requires them to learn and correctly respond to outliers of two sorts; inconsequential outliers, which require no action, and outliers that are relevant to the course of stimuli and outcomes in future trials, requiring adaptive action.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fluent in French or English
* Patient who suffers from potentially surgically remediable drug-resistant focal epilepsy
* Patient who requires evaluation with intracranial stereo-EEG electrodes and has them implanted in the anterior insula
* Patient who is able and willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have an implanted stimulation device (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator, neurostimulator)
* Intellectual/neurological/psychiatric deficiencies\* or inability to understand or follow the procedure
* Visual/motor deficiencies which could affect task performance
* The presence of seizures during routine clinical stimulation of insular electrodes
* Failure to complete the pre-experiment task training
* As determined by their clinical evaluation.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Geneva, Switzerland
OTHER
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fabienne PICARD
Prof
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Neurologie, Dpt des Neurosciences cliniques HUG
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
d'Acremont M, Bossaerts P. Neural Mechanisms Behind Identification of Leptokurtic Noise and Adaptive Behavioral Response. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1818-1830. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-02041
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.