Study of Neurophysiological Correlates of the Link Between Perception and Action
NCT ID: NCT02851121
Last Updated: 2024-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
228 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-16
2024-03-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Subjective Perception of Motor Control During Psychogenic Disorders
NCT02843932
Neural Correlates of Intern Speech
NCT02830100
Electrophysiological Evaluation of Voluntary Attention
NCT02567201
Dual Tasking in Children With Cerebral Palsy and Healthy Children: an EEG Study
NCT04634292
Sensory-motor Interactions in the Perception of Vowels: a Study in Repetition - Suppression
NCT03102983
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy volunteers
Sensorial stimulations
Experimental protocols
Emotional protocols
Protocol with a spatial dimension
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sensorial stimulations
Experimental protocols
Emotional protocols
Protocol with a spatial dimension
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Medical exam done before participation to the study
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Baccalaureate as minimum degree level
Exclusion Criteria
* Important audition or visual disorder
* Language disorders (aphasia, dysphasia, dysarthria, stammer, etc)
* Any counter-argument to MRI
* Pregnant, parturient or brest feeding women. A pregnancy test (urinary) will be offered to female participants during the inclusion medical interview. In the event of a refusal the woman will have to sign a discharge attesting that she doesn't take any risk of getting pregnant and to volunteer to participate to the trial without having recourse to the offered prgnancy test.
* Patient derpived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
* Patient under 18 years under a legal protection or unable to express their consent
* Alcohol ingested
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurent Verceuil, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Grenoble Hospital University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UniversityHospitalGrenoble
La Tronche, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barsalou LW. Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
Beffara B, Ouellet M, Vermeulen N, Basu A, Morisseau T, Mermillod M. Enhanced embodied response following ambiguous emotional processing. Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S103-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0468-6.
Bellier, L., Mazzuca, M., Thai-Van, H., Caclin, A. & Laboissière, R. (2013). Categorization of speech in early auditory evoked responses. INTERSPEECH, page 911-915. ISCA, (2013)
Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Cuthbert BN, Lang PJ. Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98.
Brandt T, Bartenstein P, Janek A, Dieterich M. Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex. Brain. 1998 Sep;121 ( Pt 9):1749-58. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1749.
Campagne A, Pebayle T, Muzet A. Oculomotor changes due to road events during prolonged monotonous simulated driving. Biol Psychol. 2005 Mar;68(3):353-68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.05.003.
Campagne, A., Petit-Boulanger, C., Pebayle, T., Muzet, A., Priez, A. (2004). Electrodermal responses according to mental and emotional loads in driving situations: influence of workload. International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology, Nottingham, 5-9 September 2004.
Cheetham M, Pedroni AF, Antley A, Slater M, Jancke L. Virtual milgram: empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Oct 20;3:29. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.029.2009. eCollection 2009.
Collet C, Dittmar A, Vernet-Maury E. Programming or inhibiting action: evidence for differential autonomic nervous system response patterns. Int J Psychophysiol. 1999 Jun;32(3):261-76. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00022-7.
D'Ausilio A, Pulvermuller F, Salmas P, Bufalari I, Begliomini C, Fadiga L. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 10;19(5):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2009). The biological basis of empathy. In J. T. Cacioppo & Bernston, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Neuroscience for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Dichgans JM, Brandt T (1978). Visual-vestibular interaction: effect on self-motion and postural control. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology (Vol. 8, pp. 755-804). Berlin: Springer.
Fradcourt B. (2014). Caractérisation du traitement visuel de scènes naturelles émotionnelles : Evaluations comportementales et en Imagerie par Résonance Magnétique fonctionnelle. Thèse de doctorat, Grenoble.
Galantucci B, Fowler CA, Turvey MT. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):361-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03193857.
Goubert L, Craig KD, Vervoort T, Morley S, Sullivan MJL, Williams CAC, Cano A, Crombez G. Facing others in pain: the effects of empathy. Pain. 2005 Dec 5;118(3):285-288. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.025. Epub 2005 Nov 14. No abstract available.
Goubert L, Eccleston C, Vervoort T, Jordan A, Crombez G. Parental catastrophizing about their child's pain. The parent version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-P): a preliminary validation. Pain. 2006 Aug;123(3):254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.035. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
Guenther FH. Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. J Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):350-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
Howard I P, Cheung BSK, Landolt J (1987). Influence of vection axis and body posture on visually induced self-rotation and tilt. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 433, 15-1-15-8.
Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006.
Jackson PL, Rainville P, Decety J. To what extent do we share the pain of others? Insight from the neural bases of pain empathy. Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.013. Epub 2006 Sep 25. No abstract available.
Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., & Lilienthal, M.G. (1993). Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203-220.
Kleinschmidt A, Thilo KV, Buchel C, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion. Neuroimage. 2002 Aug;16(4):873-82. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1181.
Kuhl PK, Conboy BT, Coffey-Corina S, Padden D, Rivera-Gaxiola M, Nelson T. Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 12;363(1493):979-1000. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2154.
Lamm C, Batson CD, Decety J. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):42-58. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42.
Lang PJ, Greenwald MK, Bradley MM, Hamm AO. Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology. 1993 May;30(3):261-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x.
Lavigne KM, Rapin LA, Metzak PD, Whitman JC, Jung K, Dohen M, Loevenbruck H, Woodward TS. Left-dominant temporal-frontal hypercoupling in schizophrenia patients with hallucinations during speech perception. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):259-67. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu004. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
Lotto AJ, Hickok GS, Holt LL. Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
Mathieu N. (2013). Traitement neurocognitif des émotions au cours du vieillissement: étude de l'"effet de positivité" et ses conséquences. Évaluations comportementales et électroencéphalographiques. Thèse de doctorat
Mathieu NG, Gentaz E, Harquel S, Vercueil L, Chauvin A, Bonnet S, Campagne A. Brain processing of emotional scenes in aging: effect of arousal and affective context. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099523. eCollection 2014.
MILGRAM S. BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. J Abnorm Psychol. 1963 Oct;67:371-8. doi: 10.1037/h0040525. No abstract available.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
Moulin-Frier, C., Laurent, R., Bessière, P., Schwartz, J.L. & Diard, J. (2012). Adverse conditions improve distinguishability of auditory, motor and perceptuo-motor theories of speech perception: an exploratory bayesian modeling study. Lang. Cognitive Proc., 27, 1240-1263.
Niedenthal PM. Embodying emotion. Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1002-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1136930.
Niedenthal PM, Mermillod M, Maringer M, Hess U. The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Dec;33(6):417-33; discussion 433-80. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000865.
Pulvermuller F, Fadiga L. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 May;11(5):351-60. doi: 10.1038/nrn2811. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
Rapin LA, Dohen M, Loevenbruck H, Whitman JC, Metzak PD, Woodward TS. Hyperintensity of functional networks involving voice-selective cortical regions during silent thought in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2012 May 31;202(2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
Rapin L, Dohen M, Polosan M, Perrier P, Loevenbruck H. An EMG study of the lip muscles during covert auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Dec;56(6):S1882-93. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0210).
Schwartz, J.; Basirat, A.; Ménard, L. & Sato, M. (2012) The Perception-for-Action-Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 336-354.
Siddle DA, Lipp OV, Dall PJ. The effects of task type and task requirements on the dissociation of skin conductance responses and secondary task probe reaction time. Psychophysiology. 1996 Jan;33(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02110.x.
Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1093535.
Skipper JI, van Wassenhove V, Nusbaum HC, Small SL. Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2387-99. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl147. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
Stern JA, Boyer D, Schroeder D. Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue. Hum Factors. 1994 Jun;36(2):285-97. doi: 10.1177/001872089403600209.
Tanahashi S, Ujike H, Ukai K. Visual rotation axis and body position relative to the gravitational direction: Effects on circular vection. Iperception. 2012;3(10):804-19. doi: 10.1068/i0479. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Vermeulen N, Pleyers G, Mermillod M. Second-person social neuroscience: connections to past and future theories, methods, and findings. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):440-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002075.
Vermeulen N, Chang B, Corneille O, Pleyers G, Mermillod M. Verifying properties of concepts spontaneously requires sharing resources with same-modality percept. Cogn Process. 2013 Mar;14(1):81-7. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0533-1. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
38RC14.420
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.