Study of Cerebral Activation by fNIRS During Vibration-induced Illusion of Movement in Healthy and Stroke Participants.

NCT ID: NCT06218563

Last Updated: 2025-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-10

Study Completion Date

2025-06-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the cerebral activation of healthy and stroke participants in 4 or 2 different conditions (repeated 2 times) of vibration-induced illusion of movement respectively, resulting in 8 or 4 vibration blocks with 3 vibrations per block. The frequency of the vibration being 80 Hz.

Healthy participants:

* Right arm, eyes opened
* Right arm, eyes closed
* Left arm, eyes opened
* Left arm, eyes closed

Stroke participants:

* Deficient side, eyes opened
* Deficient side, eyes closed

The aim is to compare the subjective sensation of movement score and cerebral activations of healthy/stroke participants depending on the condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Perceived sensations of limb and movements (kinesthesia) allow us to situate ourselves without visual feedback and not dedicate all of our attention to everyday tasks such as walking or taking and holding an object. These perceived conscious sensations come from receptors called proprioceptors which are located in the skin, joints and muscles. When a limb is moving and a muscle is stretched, the main sensation of limb stretching comes from the stimulation of a proprioceptor called the muscle spindle, more specifically from its primary ending called the 1a fibber. Artificially, 1a fibbers can be (optimally) stimulated by vibration of the muscle around 80 Hz. When stimulating 1a fibbers of the triceps, a signal of stretching is produced and an illusion of flexion can be felt as long as their no other contrary feedback involved such as vibration of the antagonist muscle or visual feedback of the immobile limb as it provides a more reliable information to the brain. As of now, neural correlates to muscle spindle vibration and illusion of movement have not been fully characterize in healthy participants and are not known in stroke participants.

To investigate the effect of vibration-induced illusion of movement on cerebral activations in healthy and stroke participants, the investigators propose to use an innovative tool of neuroimaging, the functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

fNIRS allows to investigate cortical cerebral activations by measuring cerebral haemodynamic variations. Indeed, just like fMRI, it relies on the haemodynamic response function (HRF) caused by neurovascular coupling. Its portability and non-invasiveness make it a great tool to study brain activations in a more ecological environment (in a standing or sitting position for example).

This research aims to study and compare the subjective sensation of movement and the cortical cerebral areas involved in muscle spindle vibration and illusion of movement in healthy and stroke participants.

The protocol consists of 4 or 2 different conditions (repeated 2 times) of vibration-induced illusion of movement in healthy and stroke participants respectively, resulting in 8 or 4 vibration blocks with 3 vibrations per block:

Healthy participants, 2 times each (24 vibrations):

* Right arm, eyes opened (no-illusion condition; RO)
* Right arm, eyes closed (illusion condition; RC)
* Left arm, eyes opened (no-illusion condition; LO)
* Left arm, eyes closed (illusion condition; LC)

Stroke participants, 2 times each (12 vibrations):

* Deficient side, eyes opened (no-illusion condition; DO)
* Deficient side, eyes closed (illusion condition; DC)

Conditions order is pseudorandomized, participants can start by the left or the right arm with eyes opened or closed. When starting with either the left or right arm, all conditions are completed before moving on to the other arm (for healthy participants). In total, the number of participants starting with right or left vibration should be the same.

The fNIRS devices that will be used are the Brite MKII and Brite MKIII (Artinis Medical system, Netherlands).

The vibration tool that will be used is a vibrator from VibraMoov. The subjective sensation of movement will be analyzed using the Standardized Kinesthetic Illusion Procedure (SKIP) scale. Participants will have to report their sensation of movement after each condition (3 vibrations block) from 0 to 3, 0 being no sensation of movement and 3 being a clear and precise sensation of movement. Participants will also have to describe the direction of movement, a score of 1 will be attributed if the movement described correspond to the one expected and a score of 0 will be attributed for every other movements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Stroke, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The protocol consists of 4 or 2 different conditions (repeated 2 times) of vibration-induced illusion of movement in healthy and stroke participants respectively, resulting in 8 or 4 vibration blocks with 3 vibrations per block.

Conditions order is pseudorandomized, participants can start by the left or the right arm with eyes opened or closed. When starting with either the left or right arm, all conditions are completed before moving on to the other arm (for healthy participants). In total, the number of participants starting with right or left vibration should be the same.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

vibration-induced illusion of movement

The protocol consists of 4 or 2 different conditions (repeated 2 times) of vibration-induced illusion of movement in healthy and stroke participants respectively, resulting in 8 or 4 vibration blocks with 3 vibrations per block:

Healthy participants, 2 times each (24 vibrations):

* Right arm, eyes opened (no-illusion condition; RO)
* Right arm, eyes closed (illusion condition; RC)
* Left arm, eyes opened (no-illusion condition; LO)
* Left arm, eyes closed (illusion condition; LC)

Stroke participants, 2 times each (12 vibrations):

* Deficient side, eyes opened (no-illusion condition; DO)
* Deficient side, eyes closed (illusion condition; DC)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

vibration-induced illusion of movement

Intervention Type OTHER

Conditions order is pseudorandomized, participants can start by the left or the right arm with eyes opened or closed. When starting with either the left or right arm, all conditions are completed before moving on to the other arm (for healthy participants). In total, the number of participants starting with right or left vibration should be the same.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

vibration-induced illusion of movement

Conditions order is pseudorandomized, participants can start by the left or the right arm with eyes opened or closed. When starting with either the left or right arm, all conditions are completed before moving on to the other arm (for healthy participants). In total, the number of participants starting with right or left vibration should be the same.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-85 years old
* Able to sign a consent form
* Sufficient command of the French language to understand instructions
* Affiliated to a social security scheme

Healthy participants:

* Right handed
* No neurological disease or motor deficit

Stroke participants:

* Stroke volunteers in acute phase (before day 14 post-stroke)
* Not aphasic
* Able to maintain sitting position without difficulty
* Deficit moteur
* Able to sign a consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Person under tutorship or curatorship
* Known allergy to of the fNIRS cap components: neoprene
* No vibrations feeling on the deficient side
* Vigilance-modifying drugs (high-dose psychotropics, antispastic drugs)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Canan OZSANCAK, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU d'Orléans

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU d'ORLEANS

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adamo DE, Scotland S, Martin BJ. Upper limb kinesthetic asymmetries: gender and handedness effects. Neurosci Lett. 2012 May 16;516(2):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.077. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22490887 (View on PubMed)

Chancel M, Landelle C, Blanchard C, Felician O, Guerraz M, Kavounoudias A. Hand movement illusions show changes in sensory reliance and preservation of multisensory integration with age for kinaesthesia. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.027. Epub 2018 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30063911 (View on PubMed)

Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Todd G, Gandevia SC. Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1699-706. doi: 10.1152/jn.00191.2005. Epub 2005 May 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15917323 (View on PubMed)

Desmurget M, Reilly KT, Richard N, Szathmari A, Mottolese C, Sirigu A. Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):811-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1169896.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19423830 (View on PubMed)

Gilhodes JC, Roll JP, Tardy-Gervet MF. Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man. Exp Brain Res. 1986;61(2):395-402. doi: 10.1007/BF00239528.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3948946 (View on PubMed)

Guerraz M, Provost S, Narison R, Brugnon A, Virolle S, Bresciani JP. Integration of visual and proprioceptive afferents in kinesthesia. Neuroscience. 2012 Oct 25;223:258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.059. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22864182 (View on PubMed)

Hagura N, Takei T, Hirose S, Aramaki Y, Matsumura M, Sadato N, Naito E. Activity in the posterior parietal cortex mediates visual dominance over kinesthesia. J Neurosci. 2007 Jun 27;27(26):7047-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0970-07.2007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17596454 (View on PubMed)

Imai R, Hayashida K, Nakano H, Morioka S. Brain Activity Associated with the Illusion of Motion Evoked by Different Vibration Stimulation Devices: An fNIRS Study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jul;26(7):1115-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1115. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25140108 (View on PubMed)

Kodama T, Nakano H, Ohsugi H, Murata S. Effects of vibratory stimulation-induced kinesthetic illusions on the neural activities of patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(2):419-25. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.419. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27065525 (View on PubMed)

Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012 Oct;92(4):1651-97. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23073629 (View on PubMed)

Romaiguere P, Anton JL, Roth M, Casini L, Roll JP. Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Mar;16(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00221-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12589891 (View on PubMed)

Skinner HB, Barrack RL, Cook SD. Age-related decline in proprioception. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Apr;(184):208-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6705349 (View on PubMed)

Tidoni E, Fusco G, Leonardis D, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Aglioti SM. Illusory movements induced by tendon vibration in right- and left-handed people. Exp Brain Res. 2015 Feb;233(2):375-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4121-8. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25294499 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHRO-2023-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mirroring a Movement
NCT00123448 COMPLETED