Study of Cerebral Activation by fNIRS During Gait With Different Rhythmic Auditory Stimulations in Healthy Subjects

NCT ID: NCT05789121

Last Updated: 2023-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-14

Study Completion Date

2023-03-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the cerebral activation in healthy subjects in 4 conditions of gait :

* Gait at preferred cadence without auditory stimulation (Gait1)
* Gait with low tempo rhythmic auditory stimulation by music (RAS-Slow). The beat rate of the music was 68.5 per minute for all participants.
* Gait with fast tempo synchronous rhythmic auditory stimulation by music (RAS-Fast). The beat rate of the music was set to 10% above each patient's preferred gait cadence . The preferred cadence was considered as the mean of the 6 trials during Gait 1.
* Gait without auditory stimulation (Gait2) The investigators goal is to compare cerebral activation and gait parameters during the 4 different tasks using fNIRS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gait and balance impairments caused by neurological disorders affect many people around the world and impact on independent living and quality of life. Gait rehabilitation is therefore highly important for individuals with neurological diseases. In recent years, rehabilitation strategies were carried out considering new technological devices and paradigms have been developed to increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Brain and clinical research have provided a new understanding of the capabilities of music to engage and shape motor functions to support brain recovery processes. Humans possess an ability to perceive and synchronize movements to the beating music. In context of motor rehabilitation, musical rhythm entrains movement in patients with neurological impairment, opening new frontiers for using rhythm and music to prime the motor system and favour improvement of deficiency consequences. Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) is a gait rehabilitation method in which patients synchronize foot steps to a metronome or musical beats. Typically, rhythmic cues are matched to the individual's preferred cadence and, once the movement is entrained to the external cues, the rhythm is gradually increased by 5-10% over baseline. However, little is known about the neural correlates of gait during RAS.

fNIRS (functional Near Infra Red Spectroscopy) is a functional method that allows to study the cerebral cortex changes during different tasks (like fMRI). This technique therefore makes it possible to study brain activation under more ecological conditions than fMRI and are therefore particularly suitable for exploring rehabilitation techniques.

This research aims to study and compare in healthy subjects, using, the brain regions involved in 4 conditions of gait without and with rhythmic auditory stimulations.

The protocol has 4 conditions :

* Gait at preferred cadence without auditory stimulation (Gait1)
* Gait with low tempo rhythmic auditory stimulation by music (RAS-Slow). The beat rate of the music was 68.5 per minute for all participants.
* Gait with fast tempo synchronous rhythmic auditory stimulation by music (RAS-Fast). The beat rate of the music was set to 10% above each patient's preferred gait cadence . The preferred cadence was considered as the mean of the 6 trials during Gait 1.
* Gait without auditory stimulation (Gait2) The investigators choosed a fixed order rather a randomized one, because the use of auditory stimulation may interferes with subsequent tasks. The comfortable gait was proposed as first and last conditions to check this aftereffect.

The fNIRS will used the Brite MKII apparatus. Gait parameters were recorded by FeetMe(R) Monitor (insole version FTM-DK, Atmel firmware version 2.3.10, Nordic firmware version 6.3.15).

Four gait parameters, including speed, cadence, stride length and double support time were analyzed. Gait speed is defined as the walking distance in a second (in cm/s), cadence as the number of steps within a minute walk (in steps/min). Stride length indicates the distance (in cm) from initial contact of one foot to subsequent contact of same foot. Double support time occurs when both feet are in contact with the ground simultaneously, it is normalized to stride time and expressed in % Gait Cycle (%). These 4 parameters are the most commonly used when studying the effect of SAR on gait.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy subjects

30 healthy subject aged between 18 and 40.

walking 25 m in 4 different conditions

Intervention Type DEVICE

The protocol consisted of walking 25 m in 4 different conditions in the following order:

Gait1, RAS-Slow, RAS-fast, Gait2.

* Gait 1 : preferred cadence without auditory stimulation
* RAS-Slow : Gait with low tempo rhythmic auditory stimulation by music (68.5 per minute).
* RAS-Fast : Gait with fast tempo (10% above each Gait1 cadence).
* Gait2 : preferred cadence without auditory stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

walking 25 m in 4 different conditions

The protocol consisted of walking 25 m in 4 different conditions in the following order:

Gait1, RAS-Slow, RAS-fast, Gait2.

* Gait 1 : preferred cadence without auditory stimulation
* RAS-Slow : Gait with low tempo rhythmic auditory stimulation by music (68.5 per minute).
* RAS-Fast : Gait with fast tempo (10% above each Gait1 cadence).
* Gait2 : preferred cadence without auditory stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 to 40 years old.
* No known neurological disease
* Benefiting from a social security coverage.
* Sufficient knowledge of the French language to understand the instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* Person under tutorship or curatorship
* Known allergy to components of the fNIRS device: neoprene
* History of neurological disease
* History of rheumatological disease affecting walking
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Subjects opposed to participating in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Auzou PASCAL, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHR d'Orleans

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHR Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Altenmuller E, Schlaug G. Apollo's gift: new aspects of neurologic music therapy. Prog Brain Res. 2015;217:237-52. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.029. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25725918 (View on PubMed)

Bonnal J, Monnet F, Le BT, Pila O, Grosmaire AG, Ozsancak C, Duret C, Auzou P. Relation between Cortical Activation and Effort during Robot-Mediated Walking in Healthy People: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Neuroimaging Study (fNIRS). Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 25;22(15):5542. doi: 10.3390/s22155542.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35898041 (View on PubMed)

Braunlich K, Seger CA, Jentink KG, Buard I, Kluger BM, Thaut MH. Rhythmic auditory cues shape neural network recruitment in Parkinson's disease during repetitive motor behavior. Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Mar;49(6):849-858. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14227. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30375083 (View on PubMed)

Farid L, Jacobs D, Do Santos J, Simon O, Gracies JM, Hutin E. FeetMe(R) Monitor-connected insoles are a valid and reliable alternative for the evaluation of gait speed after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Mar;28(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1792717. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32654627 (View on PubMed)

Koshimori Y, Thaut MH. Future perspectives on neural mechanisms underlying rhythm and music based neurorehabilitation in Parkinson's disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Nov;47:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30005957 (View on PubMed)

Merchant H, Grahn J, Trainor L, Rohrmeier M, Fitch WT. Finding the beat: a neural perspective across humans and non-human primates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140093. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0093.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25646516 (View on PubMed)

Thaut MH. The discovery of human auditory-motor entrainment and its role in the development of neurologic music therapy. Prog Brain Res. 2015;217:253-66. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25725919 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHRO-2022-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Language and Brain Rhythms
NCT04457622 RECRUITING NA