Comparison of the Vividtrac™ and Other Videolaryngoscopes in Clinical Practice
NCT ID: NCT03271008
Last Updated: 2017-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-01
2018-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin by Novice
NCT03161730
A Comparison of Vie-Scope and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese.
NCT05502120
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
NCT02305667
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Macintosh laryngoscopy
In this group intubation attempt is carried out with a standard Macintosh (size 3 or 4) direct laryngoscopy blade.
Direct laryngoscopy
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a size 4 (or size 3 if necessary) Macintosh blade direct laryngoscope.
KingVision videolaryngoscope
In this group intubation attempt is carried out with KingVision videolaryngoscope with a channeled, disposable single-use blade.
KingVision videolaryngoscope
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a KingVision videolaryngoscope.
VividTrac videolaryngoscope
In this group intubation attempt is carried out with VividTrac Adult model using a smartphone or laptop running the VividVision proprietary software.
Vividtrac videolaryngoscope
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a Vividtrac videolaryngoscope connected to a tablet or smartphone.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Direct laryngoscopy
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a size 4 (or size 3 if necessary) Macintosh blade direct laryngoscope.
Vividtrac videolaryngoscope
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a Vividtrac videolaryngoscope connected to a tablet or smartphone.
KingVision videolaryngoscope
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a KingVision videolaryngoscope.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* over 18 years of age
* elective intervention
* no anticipated difficult airway or intubation
* preoperative anaesthesia risk assessment by American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification: ASA grade I-II
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pecs
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gábor László Woth
clinical resident, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bálint Nagy, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Hungary
Szilárd Rendeki, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Hungary
Lajos Bogár, MD PhD DSc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Hungary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pécs, Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Pécs, Baranya, Hungary
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rendeki S, Keresztes D, Woth G, Merei A, Rozanovic M, Rendeki M, Farkas J, Muhl D, Nagy B. Comparison of VividTrac(R), Airtraq(R), King Vision(R), Macintosh Laryngoscope and a Custom-Made Videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 May 26;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0362-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6328
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.