Out-of-Hospital Randomized Comparison of Video-assisted Endotracheal Intubation
NCT ID: NCT01635660
Last Updated: 2015-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
182 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
NCT02305667
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department
NCT06327867
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
C-MAC System
Intubation
Tracheal Intubation with the assigned video laryngoscope
AP Advance
Intubation
Tracheal Intubation with the assigned video laryngoscope
King Vision
Intubation
Tracheal Intubation with the assigned video laryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intubation
Tracheal Intubation with the assigned video laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Laryngoscopy according to the algorithm of airway management not being indicated
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karl Storz Endoscopy, Germany
UNKNOWN
King Systems Corporation
INDUSTRY
LMA, Germany
UNKNOWN
Venner Medical, Germany
UNKNOWN
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erol Cavus
PD Dr. med. Erol Cavus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinikum LDW / NEF Bremen Süd
Bremen, , Germany
Uniklinikum Greifswald / DRF Luftrettung
Greifswald, , Germany
Uniklinikum Kiel / DRF Luftrettung
Rendsburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cavus E, Janssen S, Reifferscheid F, Caliebe A, Callies A, von der Heyden M, Knacke PG, Doerges V. Videolaryngoscopy for Physician-Based, Prehospital Emergency Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Comparison of Different Blade Types Using A.P. Advance, C-MAC System, and KingVision. Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1565-1574. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002735.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANKIEL-VLS-2012-CAV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.