Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2024-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes by Using the Videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope

NCT02564640

Anesthesia Intubation Complication

COMPLETED NA

Evaluation of Differences in Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Fastrack Laryngeal Mask

NCT06121895

The Device Placement Times Intubation Times Postoperative Complications

COMPLETED

Comparison of Video and Direct Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients During Surgery

NCT06973434

Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management

RECRUITING

A Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in IOP Changes, Throat Pain, IT and Hemodynamic Variables

NCT03279172

Intraocular Pressure Intubation;Difficult

COMPLETED NA

The Effect of Different Videolaryngoscopes on Intubation Success in Obese Patients

NCT03402581

Difficult Airway, Videolaryngoscopes

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group MC McGrath videolaryngoscope Group H Hugmed Videolaryngoscope

All patients will receive intravenous premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg approximately 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia. Preoperatively, standard monitoring included a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with continuous ST-segment analysis and assessment of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and intermittent non-invasive blood pressure. Following preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for three minutes, general anaesthesia would be induced with propofol (3mg/kg) a few minutes after injection of fentanyl (2µg/kg). Neuromuscular paralysis will be induced with rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg) in all patients.In group MC, direct and indirect Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score will be evaluated with McGrath videolaryngoscope.

In Group H, direct and indirect Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score will be evaluated with Hugemed videolaryngoscope.

endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type OTHER

The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope

The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes