Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes by Using the Videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT ID: NCT02564640
Last Updated: 2015-12-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were randomly allocated to two groups using a permuted block randomization method: 1) patients intubated by using the videolaryngoscopy 2) patients intubated by using the Macintosh laryngoscope . SAP, MAP, and heart rate were measured and recorded in the operating room: At baseline, before intubation, immediately after intubation and 1,2,3,4 and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
videolaryngoscope
patients intubated by using the videolaryngoscopy
videolaryngoscope
patients intubated by using the videolaryngoscope
Macintosh laryngoscope
patients intubated by using the Macintosh laryngoscope
Macintosh laryngoscope
patients intubated by using the Macintosh laryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
videolaryngoscope
patients intubated by using the videolaryngoscope
Macintosh laryngoscope
patients intubated by using the Macintosh laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged over 65 years,
* controlled hypertensive patients,
* scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting.
Exclusion Criteria
* ejection fraction \< 40%,
* any anatomical abnormality in head, neck or face,
* Mallampati score of IV,
* history of difficult intubation or laryngoscopy
65 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nilgun Kavrut Ozturk, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, Watanabe S, Taguchi N, Komatsuzaki T. Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):890-895. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048706.15720.C9.
Kanaide M, Fukusaki M, Tamura S, Takada M, Miyako M, Sumikawa K. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses during tracheal intubation using a lightwand device (Trachlight) in elderly patients with hypertension. J Anesth. 2003;17(3):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-003-0166-8.
Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Li CW, Liu KP. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.004.
Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Sun HY, Xu YC, Liu Y. Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;23(6):522-6. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000299. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AntalyaTRH 008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id