Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices

NCT ID: NCT00602979

Last Updated: 2017-05-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The placement of endotracheal tubes (intubation) is a physiologically stressful procedure for patients. Laryngoscopes are devices-typically composed of a blade attached to a handle with a light source-that allow examination of the upper airway through the mouth, often for the purposes of intubation. Recently some new laryngoscope devices (including the Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope, the Storz DCI Video laryngoscope®, McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope, and the GlideScope®) have been developed, which may either decrease the stress related to intubation (reduce neck extension, reduce risk of complications or reduce time elapsed during intubation) or improve intubation success (reduce the number of attempts at intubating). Data are being collected in this study to determine which of these commonly-used devices may be better, particularly in comparison to the current hospital standard, the Macintosh laryngoscope. All of the devices to be used in this study are currently cleared or exempt by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Historically, optical and video laryngoscopes have been used as alternative airway management devices for the difficult airway, and as rescue devices. Their use by experienced laryngoscopists has not been compared in a prospective, randomized, head-to-head comparison for routine airway management in adult surgical patients. Video and optical laryngoscopes have been developed to improve the laryngeal view for tracheal intubation and to decrease physiological stress associated with the procedure. The objective of this study is to determine whether these devices offer superior intubating conditions for routine surgical management, over the Macintosh laryngoscope, which is the current standard. The devices to be compared in this study are the most commonly used video and optical laryngoscopes on the market and are cleared or exempt by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Eligible subjects include elective adult surgical patients with an ASA status between 1 and 3 requiring general endotracheal anesthesia. Subjects with a BMI ≥ 40, or undergoing surgery in close proximity to the neck will be excluded. Prior to surgery, subjects will receive a pre-anesthesia evaluation with particular attention to the airway using the Mallampati classification system; atlanto-occipital joint extension; thyro-mental distance; temporomandibular joint function; inter-incisor distance; and dental assessment. Subjects will be randomized for intubation with one of the five laryngoscopes in equal proportions. The following data were recorded: total intubation time, maximum neck extension using an angle gauge, glottic view, assessed by the anesthesiologist using the Cook modification of the Cormack-Lehane grading system (Figure 1), and ease of tracheal intubation using a 5-point rating scale; 5 (excellent) to 1 (poor). Subjects were queried about soreness or painful swallowing in the PACU and a week later via a phone call.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laryngoscopy Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Macintosh laryngoscope

Macintosh laryngoscope (control group/direct laryngoscopy) - current standard

Group Type OTHER

Macintosh laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope

Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope (an experimental group/indirect laryngoscopy)

Group Type OTHER

Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope

Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope® (an experimental group/indirect laryngoscopy)

Group Type OTHER

Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope®

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

GlideScope Video Laryngoscope

GlideScope® Video Laryngoscope (an experimental group/indirect laryngoscopy)

Group Type OTHER

GlideScope® Video Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

McGRATH Video Laryngoscope

McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope (an experimental group/indirect laryngoscopy)

Group Type OTHER

McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Macintosh laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope®

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

GlideScope® Video Laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective adult surgical patient requiring general endotracheal anesthesia.
* Males and Females.
* ASA Physical Status 1-3.
* Age 18 years of age and older

Exclusion Criteria

* Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥35kg/m2.
* If subject is of childbearing potential, a positive pregnancy test at the time of study enrollment.
* Has physical, mental, or medical conditions which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise the subject's welfare, ability to communicate with the study staff, complete study activities, or would otherwise contraindicate study participation.
* Intubated prior to surgery.
* Severe cardiovascular, hepatic or renal disease.
* Need for nasal intubation.
* An investigator of this study.
* Inclusion in another clinical research study.
* Subject's refusal or inability to agree to and to sign the Informed Consent Form in English.
* Subject requiring awake airway management.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Systems Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jon Samuels, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cook TM. A new practical classification of laryngeal view. Anaesthesia. 2000 Mar;55(3):274-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01270.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10671848 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0710009433

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.