Comparison Study of a New Fiberoptic Intubation Device to Standard Intubation Techniques

NCT ID: NCT00906932

Last Updated: 2009-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

159 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-03-31

Study Completion Date

2004-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a two part study comparing the Trachview videoscope to standard laryngoscopy in their ability to visualize the glottic opening. It is hypothesized that the glottic view is improved with the Trachview videoscope. Not only can the Trachview provide an alternative and often improved view of the airway, but can be used for teaching novice intubators. Furthermore, the Trachview requires minimal deviation from standard intubating techniques and thus, it is much easier to learn and use than many fiberoptic scopes currently available.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a two part study. Part one: Adult airway mannequins were used. Subjects were medical students with no previous experience in intubation.

Part two: This was a convenience sample of patients undergoing elective surgery. All patients were consented. The subjects were physicians and nurse anesthetists who were going to be intubated in the operating room setting.

For both parts of the study, the subjects viewed the glottic opening using direct laryngoscopy followed or preceded by visualization of the glottic opening using the Trachview. The subjects were asked to score the amount of the glottic opening that could be visualized using the POGO (percent of glottic opening)score. Subjects were only given a very brief inservice on how to use the Trachview. Additional measurements such as presurgical airway assessments of the patients were obtained.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trachview videoscope, direct laryngoscopy

Each subject served as their own control - the Trachview videoscope and direct laryngoscopy was performed on by all subjects in a sequential fashion.

No interventions assigned to this group

See above

See above

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females
* 18 years old and older

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals less than 18
* Pregnant patients
* Inability to give consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Parker Medical

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Texas Southwestern

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim HJ, Chung SP, Park IC, Cho J, Lee HS, Park YS. Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios. Emerg Med J. 2008 May;25(5):279-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052803.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18434462 (View on PubMed)

Rowinsky EK, McGuire WP, Guarnieri T, Fisherman JS, Christian MC, Donehower RC. Cardiac disturbances during the administration of taxol. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Sep;9(9):1704-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.9.1704.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1678781 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.parkermedical.com

This is the manufacturer of the Trachview videoscope

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB# 022004-040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Video Laryngoscope, New Intubation Device
NCT02095470 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Pediatric Intubation
NCT02289872 COMPLETED NA