Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU

NCT ID: NCT06322719

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1036 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with high incidence of difficult intubation and complications. Videolaryngoscopes (VLs) devices have been proposed to improve airway management, and the use of VLs are recommended as first-line or after a first-attempt failure using direct laryngoscopy in ICU airway management algorithms. Although until relatively few years ago there were doubts about whether videolaryngoscopes had advantages over direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in critically ill patients, two recent studies (DEVICE (1), INTUBATE (2)), and a Cochrane review (3) have confirmed that videolaryn should be used?, and what is the best blade? . There are two types of blades commonly used with videolaryngoscopes: the "Macintosh" blade with a slight curvature, and hyperangulated blades. The "Macintosh" blades have a lower angle of vision, but they have the advantage of being similar to the blades commonly used in direct laryngoscopy, making them easy to use for the person performing the ETI. Hyperangulated blades have a greater angle of vision, improving glottic visualization, especially in patients with an anterior glottis. However, the need to overcome this angulation could potentially hinder the passage of the endotracheal tube to the vocal cords. It is unknown if either blade has any advantage for intubating critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this prospective multicenter randomized study is to compare successful intubation on the first attempt with the Macintosh videolaryngoscope vs the hyperangulated videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation in ICU patients.The hypothesis of the study is that tracheal intubation using the hyperangulated videolaryngoscope will improve the frequency of successful intubation on the first attempt in ICU patients requiring intubation in the intensive care unit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Failure Intubation Intubation; Difficult or Failed Videolaryngoscopy Intubation Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyperangulated videolaryngoscope

Tracheal intubation facilitated by a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

For patients assigned to the Hyperangulated videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Hyperangulated video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.

Macintosh videolaryngoscope

Tracheal intubation facilitated by a videolaryngoscope with a Macintosh type blade

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Macintosh blade videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

For patients assigned to the Macintosh videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Hyperangulated video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

For patients assigned to the Hyperangulated videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Hyperangulated video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Macintosh blade videolaryngoscope

For patients assigned to the Macintosh videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Hyperangulated video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older.
* Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.
* Need for tracheal intubation during the stay in the ICU.
* The device to be used for intubation is a videolaryngoscope

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow for the randomization of the procedure.
* Need for tracheal intubation with a device other than the videolaryngoscope (fiberoptic bronchoscope, direct laryngoscopy, tracheostomy, etc.).
* Tracheal intubation performed outside the ICU (Emergency Department, Hospital ward, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Manuel Taboada Muñiz

Professor Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manuel Taboada, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital General de Albacete

Albacete, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Cáceres

Cáceres, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital de Denia

Denia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital General Universitario de Eche

Elche, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón

Gijón, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada

Granada, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín

Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León

León, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario La Princesa

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda

Majadahonda, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Móstoles

Móstoles, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense

Ourense, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra

Pontevedra, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián

San Sebastián, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander

Santander, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Complejo Asistencial de Segovia

Segovia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro de Vigo

Vigo, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Ribera Povisa Vigo

Vigo, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Manuel Taboada, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

678195618

Manuel Taboada

Role: CONTACT

678195618

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Manuel Taboada

Role: primary

Pablo Rama

Role: primary

Luisa María Charco

Role: primary

Marta Giné

Role: primary

Jose Ignacio Hermoso

Role: primary

Marta Carrió

Role: primary

Ana Pérez

Role: primary

Rosaura María Santamarina

Role: primary

Jose Luis Aguilera

Role: primary

Angel Becerra

Role: primary

Inmaculada Fernández

Role: primary

María Bermúdez

Role: primary

Mercedes Power

Role: primary

Raquel García

Role: primary

Irene Vallejo

Role: primary

Fernando Ramasco

Role: primary

Sara Del Valle

Role: primary

Raquel Fernández

Role: primary

María Concepción Alonso

Role: primary

María Cristina Iglesias

Role: primary

Marc Vives

Role: primary

Marina Varela

Role: primary

Anxo Rubín

Role: primary

Mónica Williams

Role: primary

Francisco Javier García

Role: primary

Sara Martínez

Role: primary

Azucena Pajares

Role: primary

Inés María Rodríguez Naz

Role: primary

Rafael Cabadas

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Taboada M, Doldan P, Calvo A, Almeida X, Ferreiroa E, Baluja A, Carinena A, Otero P, Caruezo V, Naveira A, Otero P, Alvarez J. Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Conditions in Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective, Observational Study. Anesthesiology. 2018 Aug;129(2):321-328. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002269.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29787386 (View on PubMed)

Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, Rangasami J, Suntharalingam G, Gale R, Cook TM; Difficult Airway Society; Intensive Care Society; Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine; Royal College of Anaesthetists. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29406182 (View on PubMed)

Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, Resnick-Ault D, Seitz KP, Russell DW, Gaillard JP, Latimer AJ, Ghamande SA, Gibbs KW, Vonderhaar DJ, Whitson MR, Barnes CR, Walco JP, Douglas IS, Krishnamoorthy V, Dagan A, Bastman JJ, Lloyd BD, Gandotra S, Goranson JK, Mitchell SH, White HD, Palakshappa JA, Espinera A, Page DB, Joffe A, Hansen SJ, Hughes CG, George T, Herbert JT, Shapiro NI, Schauer SG, Long BJ, Imhoff B, Wang L, Rhoads JP, Womack KN, Janz DR, Self WH, Rice TW, Ginde AA, Casey JD, Semler MW; DEVICE Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 3;389(5):418-429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301601. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37326325 (View on PubMed)

Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, Tassistro E, Antolini L, Bauer P, Lascarrou JB, Szuldrzynski K, Camporota L, Pelosi P, Sorbello M, Higgs A, Greif R, Putensen C, Agvald-Ohman C, Chalkias A, Bokums K, Brewster D, Rossi E, Fumagalli R, Pesenti A, Foti G, Bellani G; INTUBE Study Investigators. Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries. JAMA. 2021 Mar 23;325(12):1164-1172. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1727.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33755076 (View on PubMed)

Russotto V, Lascarrou JB, Tassistro E, Parotto M, Antolini L, Bauer P, Szuldrzynski K, Camporota L, Putensen C, Pelosi P, Sorbello M, Higgs A, Greif R, Grasselli G, Valsecchi MG, Fumagalli R, Foti G, Caironi P, Bellani G, Laffey JG, Myatra SN; INTUBE Study Investigators. Efficacy and adverse events profile of videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients: subanalysis of the INTUBE study. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;131(3):607-616. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37208282 (View on PubMed)

Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;129(4):612-623. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.027. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35820934 (View on PubMed)

Araujo B, Rivera A, Martins S, Abreu R, Cassa P, Silva M, Gallo de Moraes A. Video versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2024 Jan 2;28(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04727-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38167459 (View on PubMed)

Taboada M, Estany-Gestal A, Fernandez J, Vazquez O, Pajares A, Ramasco F, Martinez S, Vallejo I, Perez A, Rama-Maceiras P, Bermudez M, Power M, Garcia-Alvarez R, Fernandez-Villa I, Aguilera JL, Carrio M, Cabadas R, Rubin A, Williams MM, Fernandez-Garcia R, Becerra A, Gine M, Garcia FJ, Iglesias MC, Santamarina RM, Del Valle S, Charco LM, Alonso MC, Rodriguez IM, Varela M, Hermoso JI, Vives M, Cabaleiro T. Hyperangulated versus Macintosh blades for intubation with videolaryngoscopy in ICU: the randomised multicentre INVIBLADE-ICU trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e086691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086691.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39237284 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INVIBLADE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.