Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
C-MAC
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC
C-MAC arm
Glidescope
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope
Glidescope arm
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
C-MAC
C-MAC arm
Glidescope
Glidescope arm
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mallampati classification scale score of 3 or 4
* Neck circumference greater than 40cm for males, 38 cm for females
* mouth opening less than 3cm, but greater than 2cm
Exclusion Criteria
* prisoners
* history of easy intubation (success on first attempt with direct laryngoscopy)
* known unstable cervical spine injury
* emergency surgery
* nasal intubation route
* planned awake technique
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Iowa
OTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Aziz
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):629-36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea34.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
62199040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id