Trial Outcomes & Findings for STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness (NCT NCT01632683)
NCT ID: NCT01632683
Last Updated: 2017-11-30
Results Overview
Success rate is defined as a single blade insertion with successful tracheal tube placement confirmed by return of end-tidal carbon dioxide
COMPLETED
NA
1100 participants
1 week
2017-11-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
C-MAC
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
548
|
552
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
548
|
552
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=548 Participants
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=552 Participants
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
Total
n=1100 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 • n=5 Participants
|
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=7 Participants
|
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
292 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
267 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
559 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
256 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
285 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
541 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekSuccess rate is defined as a single blade insertion with successful tracheal tube placement confirmed by return of end-tidal carbon dioxide
Outcome measures
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=548 Participants
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=552 Participants
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation Success Rate
|
512 participants
|
531 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekIntubation time is defined as the time from blade insertion to first return of end-tidal carbon dioxide
Outcome measures
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=548 Participants
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=552 Participants
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation Time
|
47 seconds
Interval 39.0 to 60.0
|
47 seconds
Interval 38.0 to 58.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPopulation: Cormack-Lehane grade
Laryngeal view is defined by the modified Cormack and Lehane scale (1-4) and is assessed by the clinician and the study team. Grade 1 is considered to be a good view while grade 4 is considered to be a poor view.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=4 grade
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=4 grade
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved
Grade 1
|
482 participants
|
398 participants
|
|
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved
Grade 2
|
41 participants
|
146 participants
|
|
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved
Grade 3
|
8 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved
Grade 4
|
10 participants
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekThe need for use of a gum-elastic bougie or external laryngeal manipulation to facilitate tube placement will be measured by the study team.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=548 Participants
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=552 Participants
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation
|
117 Participants
|
128 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPatients will be examined for evidence of mucosal or dental injury upon intervention. Patients will be asked if they have a sore throat in the recovery room, and their medical record will be reviewed to determine if any other airway related complications were observed by the clinical team including the need for reintubation or steroid administration to reduce swelling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=548 Participants
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=552 Participants
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Observed Complications
|
97 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
Adverse Events
C-MAC
Glidescope
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
C-MAC
n=548 participants at risk
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
C-MAC: C-MAC arm
|
Glidescope
n=552 participants at risk
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope: Glidescope arm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
pharyngeal injury
|
0.73%
4/548
|
1.3%
7/552
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place