Face-to-face Tracheal Intubation: a Comparison of Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach

NCT ID: NCT02286570

Last Updated: 2015-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trauma victims had to be intubated at the scene of area in different conditions. Face-to-face intubation in an entrapped patient is one of these situations. The investigators want to compare the efficacy of Glidescope, Airtraq and Fastrach in simulating face-ro-face intubation in adult patients aged between 18-60 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators record the demographic and the airway data of the patients (thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mallampati score, mandibula protrusions, interincisor distance..etc). The hemodynamic data of the patients baseline preoperatively, after induction, after insertion of the device, after intubation, and 2 minutes intervals after intubation during the ten minutes. Cormack-Lehane grade of the videolaryngoscopes, insertion time, intubation time, need of optimisation maneuvers, mucosal damage, teeth and tongue damage, postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia were recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Difficult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

face-to-face intubation of Glidescope

patients were intubated using glidescope by face-to-face approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glidescope

Intervention Type DEVICE

videolaryngoscope used for endotracheal intubation

face-to-face intubation with Airtraq

patients were intubated using the Airtraq by face-to-face approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Airtraq

Intervention Type DEVICE

videolaryngoscope used for endotracheal intubation

face-to-face intubation with fastrach

patients were intubated using the Fastrach by face-to-face approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fastrach

Intervention Type DEVICE

intubating laryngeal mask airway used for blind endotracheal intubation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Glidescope

videolaryngoscope used for endotracheal intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Airtraq

videolaryngoscope used for endotracheal intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fastrach

intubating laryngeal mask airway used for blind endotracheal intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-60 years of age
* Elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation
* Normal airway variables
* BMI\< 30

Exclusion Criteria

* \< 18 years or \> 60 years
* Emergency procedures
* Known difficult airways
* BMI\> 30
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kocaeli University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zehra Ipek ARSLAN

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zehra I ARSLAN, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KOU KAEK 2014/255

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.