Comparison of AirTraq Laryngoscope to Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation of Patients With Potential Cervical Spine Injury

NCT ID: NCT00664612

Last Updated: 2008-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Intubation is frequently required for trauma patients as part of the resuscitative effort. When the stability of the cervical spine is unknown, the potential for spinal cord damage during intubation is significant; the question of the safest intubating technique has not been resolved. Previous Studies have evaluated Macintosh Laryngoscopy, Bullard Laryngoscope, face mask ventilation, fibre-optic guided oral and nasal intubation, esophageal Combitube®, Laryngeal Mask Airway® (LMA), and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway® (ILMA) use with respect to cervical spine movement. Our previous study evaluated the Intubating Lighted Stylet (Lightwand®) and GlideScope® versus the Macintosh Laryngoscope.

Another method of securing endotracheal intubation, approved and in routine use, is the AirTraq® videolaryngoscope (ProMedic, Inc, Bonita Springs, FL, USA). The AirTraq videolaryngoscope is a videolaryngoscope with an external video display of the glottic opening and an endotracheal tube track to guide the ETT through the vocal cords (www.airtraq.com). When a clear view of the vocal cords is obtained, the endotracheal tube may be advanced into the trachea. This technique can be performed rapidly and safely and there is the perception that it involves less cervical spine movement than direct laryngoscopy.

We propose to study the AirTraq videolaryngoscope to determine if its use would result in reduced cervical spine movement during intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the surgeon's consent, informed and written consent will be ob¬tained from patients who are undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative clinical assessment of the patients will include routine airway evaluation of dentition, mouth opening, tongue size, Mallampati score, and neck mobility, as well as height, weight, and age.

While awake, the patients will be placed on the operating room table with a rigid board under their head, neck, and torso in order to simulate the table on which patients involved in trauma are placed in the emergency room. In-line stabilization (ILS), as recommended by the ATLS guidelines, will be applied to maintain the patient's head in the neutral position and reduce neck movement dur¬ing laryngoscopy.

After standard pre-oxygenation, anesthesia will be induced in routine fashion with 2 3 mg/kg propofol and 2-5 mcg/kg fentanyl; rocuro¬nium 0.8 mg/kg will be administered to effect muscle paralysis. The patient will be then be ventilated with 100% O2 via bag/mask for 3 minutes. (Oxygenation with 100% O2 provides an oxygen reservoir for at least 5 minutes while laryngoscopy is completed.) This is the standard of care in anesthesia.

After the patient is anesthetized, a sealed envelope containing computer a generated random assignment will be opened. Laryngoscopy will then be performed two times, with the Macintosh laryngoscope and with the AirTraq videolaryngoscope, in random order as determined by the envelope. Between laryngoscopies, the patient will be ventilated with sevoflurane in 100% oxygen.

Male patients will be intubated with an 8.0 mm inner diameter endotracheal tube (ETT) and women with a 7.0 mm or 7.5 mm ETT at the discretion of the anesthesiologist.

For AirTraq videolaryngoscopy, the AirTraq will be inserted and a view of the vocal cords will be obtained. The ETT will be advanced through the track until the tip of the ETT is visible at the glottic opening and then removed with the AirTraq videolaryngoscope.

For direct Macintosh laryngoscopy, a size 3 laryngoscope blade will be recommended in all patients, but the anesthesiologist may choose another size if deemed necessary. With laryngoscopy, the glottis will be exposed to enable positioning of the endotracheal tube at the vocal cords.

During the second laryngoscopy in the above sequence, the trachea will be intubated. The study is then complete. The hard board will be removed and the surgery will proceed in the usual fashion.

The laryngoscopy and intubation will be recorded by a portable fluoroscopy unit for subsequent review by the radiologist to assess cervical spine movement.

Laryngoscopy time will be defined as the time from when the laryngoscope blade or AirTraq videolaryngoscope passes the teeth of the patient until the time the endotracheal tube is positioned at the opening of the larynx. If the intubation sequence is longer than 120 seconds, it will be deemed a failure and recorded as such.

The Cormack-Lehane score, representing the degree of glottic exposure, of the larynx will be recorded for all patients. Blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure will be recorded every minute during the study.

To minimize inter-operator variability, all bag-mask ventilation, laryngoscopy, and intubation will be completed by one person.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trauma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cervical Spine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Air Traq then Macintosh

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AirTraq

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngoscopy with AirTraq

2

Macintosh then AirTraq

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AirTraq

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngoscopy with AirTraq

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AirTraq

Laryngoscopy with AirTraq

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective non-cardiac surgery patients requiring intubation for the surgery.
* (Cardiac surgery uses TEE; there would not be space for the fluoroscopy machine.)
* ASA 1-3
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 35

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with previous neck surgery or unstable C-spine
* patients with Reflux disease (GERD)
* patients who are or may be pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Western Ontario

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Timothy P Turkstra, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western University, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13481

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R-07-337

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id