Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Intubation is required to secure the airway in patient during an anesthesia management or a mechanical ventilation at intensive care units. Laryngoscopes are the assisting tools for intubations. The most widely used laryngoscope type is one with a Macintosh blade. However, various types of laryngoscopes have been developed to be used for in case of difficult intubations, the intubation of the patients with head and neck trauma, or the intubation attempts carried out by inexperienced individuals. Truview EVO2® and Airtraq® are newly developed laryngoscopes, integrated with an optical view system.
The Truphatek TruView EVO2® (Truphatek International Ltd, Netanya, Israel) is a recently introduced, easy viewing type of laryngoscope, modified from the blades of Macintosh type laryngoscopes, having an angle of 46° at the end of blade and including a camera system that magnifies the image.
The Airtraq® laryngoscope (ATQ; King Medical Systems, Newark, DE) is also a newly developed type of laryngoscope, including optical imaging system. There is a channel on the device for the placement of the endotracheal tube. Endotracheal tube is inserted into the channel before the laryngoscopy. It has been reported that Airtraq is a novel single use laryngoscope which provides glottis display without any deviation in the normal position of the oral, pharyngeal or the tracheal axes.
In the literature, there are many studies comparing the effects of these newly developed laryngoscopes on cervical motions in different scenarios with cadavers and normal patients. However, in these studies, individual vertebral motion was reported during the placement of the tube, while the angulation of the head and neck and the difficulty of the intubations were not clear.
In this study our first hypothesis was cervical motion during endotracheal intubation in Truview EVO2® and Airtraq® types of laryngoscopes is lesser than Macintosh. The second one was the endotracheal intubation time is similar to the Macintosh that is used more often.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
King Vision and Cervical Spines Movement
NCT01914601
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.
NCT01032460
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523
C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion
NCT03567902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Truview EVO2®
Patients were randomly assigned into three groups with the sealed envelope method according to the laryngoscope type, which we had and we were used to; Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes were used in direct laryngoscopy Group DL (n=50), Truview EVO2® Group TV (n=50) and Airtraq® Group ATQ (n=50), respectively.
Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes
Airtraq®
Patients were randomly assigned into three groups with the sealed envelope method according to the laryngoscope type, which we had and we were used to; Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes were used in direct laryngoscopy Group DL (n=50), Truview EVO2® Group TV (n=50) and Airtraq® Group ATQ (n=50), respectively
Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes
Direct laryngoscopy
Patients were randomly assigned into three groups with the sealed envelope method according to the laryngoscope type, which we had and we were used to; Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes were used in direct laryngoscopy Group DL (n=50), Truview EVO2® Group TV (n=50) and Airtraq® Group ATQ (n=50), respectively
Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Macintosh type, Truview EVO2® type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
20 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Trakya University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alkin Colak
Associate professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Colak A, Copuroglu E, Yilmaz A, Sahin SH, Turan N. A Comparison of the Effects of Different Types of Laryngoscope on the Cervical Motions: Randomized Clinical Trial. Balkan Med J. 2015 Apr;32(2):176-82. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15335. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
alkin01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.