Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02955511

Last Updated: 2022-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-02

Study Completion Date

2021-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis The use of Macintosh blade sized #3.5 (vs Macintosh size #3) would reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation and improve the glottic view.

Study objective The purpose of this research study is to compare 3 different laryngoscope blades (sizes: 3.5, 3.5 and 3) and see if the blades size 3.5 will reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation and improve the physician's view of the glottis compared to the standard direct laryngoscope using the blade size 3, in patients undergoing lumbar surgery.

Primary end point: time to achieve successful tracheal intubation.

Secondary end points: glottic view at intubation, number of intubation attempts and effectiveness of the integrated suction in the Inscope Direct Laryngoscope.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laryngoscopy is a common medical procedure used during elective and emergency intubations. The procedure is performed with either a direct or video laryngoscope with the device selected dependent on tool availability, provider (i.e. anesthesiologist, emergency physician, ENT physician, paramedic, etc.) preference, patient characteristics, and intubation difficulty. The direct laryngoscope technique involves a line-of-sight view from the patient's mouth to vocal cords along the blade of the scope. The direct laryngoscopy technique is the oldest technique associated with intubation. However, despite continuous improvements to direct laryngoscope size and shape since its inception in the late 19th century, no improvement yet addresses one major problem with airway visualization: the provider will experience a difficult intubation if liquids (i.e. gastric content, blood, mucus, etc.) obstruct the view.

The Sun-Med GreenLine®/D™ Macintosh is a line of disposable direct Macintosh laryngoscopes. It features a stainless steel blade and polycarbonate light-pipe to direct light into the airway. The handle, with integrated batteries and LED light, and blade are separately packaged prior to use. The GreenLine®/D™ Macintosh line is available in the standard sizes (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) and a new size built to improve blade sizing for many adults 3.5 when a Mac 3 is too short, but a Mac 4 is too large. The GreenLine®/D™ Macintosh does not feature integrated suction.

The Inscope Direct Laryngoscope (developed by Inscope Medical Solutions) is a new disposable direct laryngoscope with two integrated and controllable (flow on/off) suction pathways. By integrating controllable suction with two independent pathways into the laryngoscope, the provider is able to select the primary (blade tip) suction pathway to clear secretions ahead of the laryngoscope and the secondary (at blade mid-length, below blade) to prevent and clear fluids that may re-accumulate during the procedure. Integrating the suction into the device prevents the common current practice of "juggling" the current suction catheter and endotracheal (breathing) tube in one hand while holding the patient's airway open with the other hand. While the incidence of aspiration of fluids into the lungs as a result of poor airway fluid management is low, the outcomes associated with this complication are very poor.

The Inscope Direct Laryngoscope has been developed as a Macintosh 3.5 sized blade to meet the size requirements of the majority of patients. This assumption is backed up by a trend among disposable direct laryngoscope manufacturers toward the 3.5 blade size, with at least 5 creating a 3.5 blade, including Teleflex, Sun-Med, Flexicare, Mercury Medical, and Curaplex.

This study will compare the Inscope Direct Laryngoscope (blade size 3.5) with the currently used standard single-use Sun-Med Greenline/D Macintosh laryngoscopes DL-blade mac size and Sun-Med Greenline/D-blade size 3.5.

All Direct Laryngoscopes are considered a Class I exempt device by the FDA. Because the risks associated with laryngoscopes are well known and documented, they are considered a non-significant risk device for studies involving humans.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Airway

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blade MAC size 3

Patient will be intubated using a:

Direct Laryngoscope (DL) Mac size 3 (Sun-Med GreenLine®/D™ Macintosh)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Blade MAC size 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3

Blade MAC size 3.5

Patient will be intubated using a:

DL-blade mac size 3.5 (Sun-Med Greenline®/D™ Macintosh)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Blade MAC size 3.5

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3.5

Inscope Blade size 3.5

Patient will be intubated using a:

Inscope DL-blade size 3.5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Inscope Blade size 3.5

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patient will be intubated using the Inscope Blade size 3.5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blade MAC size 3

Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blade MAC size 3.5

Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3.5

Intervention Type DEVICE

Inscope Blade size 3.5

Patient will be intubated using the Inscope Blade size 3.5

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery procedures under general anesthesia
2. Patients with a documented BMI of \<35
3. Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document
4. 18 - 80 years of age of either gender
5. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I - II or III

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who are deemed to be such a significant of an airway risk that they necessitate awake fiberoptic intubation or a difficult tracheal intubation is anticipated
2. Patients with history of difficult intubation
3. Patients with oxygen saturation less than 95% at room air
4. Patients with history facial abnormalities, oral-pharyngeal cancer or reconstructive surgery
5. Any pathologies of the mouth, pharynx or larynx, or the access to the airway is restricted
6. Patients with Immobilized cervical spine, or history of cervical abnormalities
7. Patients with a history of uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux, hiatus hernia or diabetic gastroparesis
8. Any coagulation disorder
9. Pregnant patients
10. Emergency surgeries
11. Any other conditions or use of any medication which may interfere with the conduct of the Study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roya Yumul, M.D.,PhD.

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roya Yumul, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00045198

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.