Trial Comparing the Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

NCT ID: NCT02856672

Last Updated: 2016-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators study compared the Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable with the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, hypothesizing that the two devices would provide adequate oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and neck positions and perform similarly during pressure controlled ventilation in neutral position, despite differences in their structural design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable, LTS-D (VBM Medizintechnik GmbH , Sulz, Germany) and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA (Intavent Orthofix, Maidenhead, UK) are second generation, single-use, supraglottic airway devices( SADs), with added gastric access, for use in spontaneously and mechanically ventilated patients undergoing general anesthesia.

The effectiveness of the LTS-D and the SLMA has been well established; however, the oropharyngeal seal pressure of both devices in different head/neck positions and the performance of these devices using positive pressure ventilation have not been evaluated. Changing the head/neck position can alter the sealing capabilities of the SAD.

To the investigators best knowledge there are no studies comparing the oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and neck position when using these devices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adverse Anesthesia Outcome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients ASA I and II with normal airways, for minor elective surgical

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 yr, weight \<50 kg, or \> 100 kg , a known difficult airway, active gastro esophageal reflux disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bnai Zion Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LUIS.GAITINI

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luis A Gaitini, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bnai Zion Medical Center and Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Somri M, Vaida S, Garcia Fornari G, Mendoza GR, Charco-Mora P, Hawash N, Matter I, Swaid F, Gaitini L. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27716165 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BnaiZionMC-16-LG-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.