Comparison of SensaScope Intuboscope and McGrath Series 5 for Endotracheal Intubation

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled prospective study of laryngoscopy and intubation time comparing SensaScope and the McGrath® Series 5 video laryngoscope.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of McGrath Series 5 and Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube (DLT) Intubation

NCT02329041

Intubation;Difficult Thoracic Disease Intubation Complication

COMPLETED NA

Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury

NCT05619965

Trauma Patient Satisfaction Airway Morbidity

UNKNOWN NA

Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?

NCT04850976

Airway Management

COMPLETED NA

Comparison Between McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for DLT Intubation in Thoracic Surgery Patients.

NCT05988736

Thoracic Diseases Thoracic Neoplasms Thoracic Empyema

UNKNOWN NA

Comparative Evaluation of Periglottic Airway Devices With Performed Shape

NCT05639439

Airway Management

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of videolaryngoscopy is increasing as a technique for rescue intubation as well as for elective intubation. Current airway management guidelines recommend video-assisted laryngoscopy as a choice for basic airway management. This is a proposed comparison study of a video laryngoscope, use in the daily anesthesia practice, and its likely increased success compared to semi-rigid stylet. An national, mono center, prospective randomized comparative trial (RCT) is proposed testing the superiority of oral tracheal intubation with the McGrath® Series 5 versus SensaScope in adult patients under general anaesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SensaScope

Time for tracheal intubation with the SensaScope

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Time for tracheal intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve

McGrath Series 5

Time for tracheal intubation with the McGrath Series 5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Time for tracheal intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Time for tracheal intubation

In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 Years No concurrent participation in another study
* capacity to consent
* Present written informed consent of the research participant
* Elective surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years
* Existing pregnancy
* Lack of consent
* inability to consent
* emergency patients
* Emergency situations in the context of a Difficult Airway Management
* ASA classification\> 3
* situations where the possibility of accumulated gastric contents
* Participation in another study

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No