A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT ID: NCT02878005
Last Updated: 2016-08-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-31
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT05347680
The New Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable
NCT02884843
A Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy With Blind Intubation Via Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable
NCT02884895
Ambu Aura-i Laryngeal Mask Versus Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway for Tracheal Intubation in Adults
NCT02226211
A Study Between the Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable and the Ambu AuraGain in Pediatric Patients
NCT02977559
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The iLTS-D comes in one size. According to the depth of insertion, this device is equivalent to size 4 for patients 175patients 175 to 190 cm tall, or size 5 for patients taller than 190 cm. The iLTS-D is provided by the manufacturer with a compatible 7.5mm ETT and with a plastic stabilizer for removal of the device.
The current randomized study was designed to assess the success rate of blind and fiberoptic endotracheal intubation using iLTS-D, in comparison with the and Ambu® AuraGain™ in adult patients under general anesthesia
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intubating laryngeal Tube Suction
Intubating laryngeal Tube Suction
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bnai Zion Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
LUIS.GAITINI
M.D.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Somri M, Hochman O, Gaitini L, Hossein J, Gomez-Rios MA. The intubating laryngeal tube (iLTS-D) versus Ambu(R) Auragain as a conduit facilitating fiberoptic tracheal intubation in adult population: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Dec;88(12):1074-1076. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16731-3. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BnaiZionMC-16-LG-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.