Ambu®AuraGain™ Versus I-gel® in Obese Patients

NCT ID: NCT03110393

Last Updated: 2018-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-20

Study Completion Date

2017-09-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is the randomized comparison of two laryngeal mask (Intersurgical i-gel® and Ambu®AuraGain™) in obese patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Since the incidence of a difficult intubation lies between 4.5% -7.5%, the search for alternative airway devices has been forced in the past.

As an option, the laryngeal mask is suitable, which has been used as a universal airway with a high degree of safety in routine anesthesia.

There are numbers of different laryngeal masks available which have the characteristic to insert an endotracheal tube through the ventilation lumen.

The indications for these laryngeal masks can be extended due to continuous improvements in the laryngeal masks, these laryngeal masks can also be used in obese patients. Obese patients generally have a 4-fold increased risk of a difficult airway, and a BMI over 35 is a predictor of a difficult tracheal intubation.

There are no studies comparing the Intersurgical i-gel® Laryngeal Mask and the Ambu®AuraGain ™ Laryngeal Mask in obese patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obese

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ambu® AuraGain™

Intervention with Ambu® AuraGain™Laryngeal Mask

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ambu AuraGain

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insert and intubation of an Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask

Intersurgical i-gel®

Intervention with Intersurgical i-gel® Laryngeal Mask

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intersurgical i-gel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insert and intubation of an Intersurgical i-gel®

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ambu AuraGain

Insert and intubation of an Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intersurgical i-gel

Insert and intubation of an Intersurgical i-gel®

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA 1-3
* Shoulder-/Elbow-/Hip-/Knee- or Foot - Surgery
* Signed informed consent
* BMI \> 35kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-sober patients (last meal \<6 h)
* Symptomatic reflux disease
* Hiatus hernia
* Significant cardiovascular risk factors
* Severe COPD
* Gastric band or gastric bypass
* Disease which allows an accurate examination of the physicians (e.g. neuromuscular, mental, metabolic disease)
* Drug or drug abuse in the recent past
* Legal immaturity (incompetence)
* Acute disease, which calls into question the narcotic potential
* Patients with whom the use of a laryngeal mask is contraindicated or otherwise not possible
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schulthess Klinik

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Berthold Moser

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Berthold Berthold, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Schulthess Klinik

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schulthess Klinik

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moser B, Keller C, Audige L, Dave MH, Bruppacher HR. Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu(R) AuraGain laryngeal mask vs the i-gel airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Feb;63(2):187-194. doi: 10.1111/aas.13242. Epub 2018 Aug 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30088266 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Schulthess_Anä_10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laryngeal Mask in Morbid Obesity
NCT04243564 WITHDRAWN NA