A Comparison of Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Adult

NCT ID: NCT03544749

Last Updated: 2019-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-07

Study Completion Date

2018-10-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The supraglottic airway device(SAD), as an alternative to the endotracheal tube is inserted into the oral cavity and seals the upper esophagus and the surrounding tissue, effectively securing airway. SAD has evolved in recent years to increase efficiency and secure safety. The recently developed Ambu® AuraGain™ is a second-generation SAD with a built-in gastric port and is designed to be fitted well in the larynx and oral cavity after insertion because the shaft is bent at an angle of 90 degrees and has an inflatable cuff.

In a previous study, Ambu® AuraGain™ showed a higher sealing pressure and better fibreoptic finding compared to LMA Supreme in laparoscopic surgery.

On the other hand, I-gel and Ambu® AuraGain™, both of the second-generation SAD, show comparatively excellent performance according to the results of previous studies. However, there are no studies comparing the characteristics of two airway devices in adults.

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of I-gel and Ambu® AuraGain™ to make a difficult airway-like situation using cervical collar for adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laryngeal Mask Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ambu® AuraGain™ group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ambu® AuraGain™

Intervention Type DEVICE

After induction of anesthesia, Ambu® AuraGain™ will be inserted for the mechanical ventilation.

I-gel group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

I-gel

Intervention Type DEVICE

After induction of anesthesia, I-gel will be inserted for the mechanical ventilation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ambu® AuraGain™

After induction of anesthesia, Ambu® AuraGain™ will be inserted for the mechanical ventilation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

I-gel

After induction of anesthesia, I-gel will be inserted for the mechanical ventilation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are undergoing surgery under general anesthesia where supraglottic airway management will be appropriate.

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2
* High risk of regurgitation (hiatus hernia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, non-fasting status)
* Criteria for difficult airway
* Patients with cervical disease or previous cervical spine surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tae Kyong Kim

Clinical professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tae Kyong Kim, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1803-124-932

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.