Three Inflation Methods of Ambú Auragain™ and Its Adverse Effects
NCT ID: NCT04795544
Last Updated: 2022-01-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
210 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-18
2021-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To insert the SGD safely in these situations, the Fourth National Audit Project has encouraged the use of second-generation SGD equipped with the passage of a nasogastric tube. Ambu Auragain™ is a recent second-generation SGD with an incorporated gastric drainage channel and the capability of working as a conduit for tracheal intubation. It has higher leak pressure than the ones of first generation, which is a key marker of efficacy and safety of its use; a higher leak pressure suggests a better seal between the artificial airway and patient's airway.
However, there are still few reports of which volume of cuff is the most appropriate for it use. The cuff inflating volume is not standardized and it is common practice to inflate the SGD cuff according to the manufacturer's recommendations, without using a manometer.
A hyperinflation of the laryngeal mask cuff was associated with complications ranging from sore throat, or dysphagia and dysphonia, to more serious complications such as paralysis of the vocal cord, arytenoid cartilages dislocation, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypoglossal nerve injury. Also, the excess of volume or pressure is related to poor ventilation and increase the risk of gastric insufflation.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the best cuff inflation method, in order to limit the intracuff pressure beyond the recommended maximum pressure (PM \< 60 cmH2O) and to allows decrease the pharyngo-laryngeal complications.
The Primary outcome is to compare three different cuff inflating methods using Auragain™ laryngeal mask during fibro bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures, and to control the intracuff pressure, and the effect on pharyngo-laryngeal complications.
The three different cuff inflating methods are: 1) residual volume group (RV group ) 2) half of the maximum volume group (MV group) 3) unchanged volume group (NV group)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Three Inflation Methods of the Ambú Auraonce™ and Its Adverse Effects
NCT04769791
Evaluation of the Use of Tracheal Intubation Through a Laryngeal Tube to Intubate Anesthetized Patients
NCT03165461
Comparing the Efficiency of Three Third-generation Supraglottic Airways as an Intubation Route
NCT02975466
Orotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fibro Bronchoscope With vs Without Supraglottic Device
NCT04356547
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If the LMA is not in the proper position at the first attempt, anesthetist will use an "up and down" maneuver to adjust and reposition LMA to attain satisfactory ventilation. If this maneuver fails, LMA will be withdrawn from the mouth of the participants and a second attempt will be authorized to acquire a correct position. If the proper position of LMA cannot be achieved after two attempts, the airway will be controlled with another device or a tracheal intubation will be performed and the participants will be excluded from the trial.
The patient´s lungs will be ventilated with the anesthesia machine in controlled volume mode, using the following parameters: Tidal volume, 8 ml/kg; frequency, 12-14 per min; the ratio of inspiratory and expiratory, (I: E) = 1:2; and positive end expiratory pressure, 5 cmH20.
After the laryngeal mask will be fixed with adhesive tape and the vital signs will be stable, the laryngeal mask cuff will be connected with a closed system manometer composed of a three-way stopcock, a 5 ml syringe and a manometer. Intracuff pressure will be measured and recorded, if it exceeds of 60 cmH20 we will deflate the cuff 1 mL by 1 mL with the syringe until intracuff pressure reaches 60 cmH20. The deflated volume and the final intracuff pressure will be recorded. We will measure the inspiratory peak airway pressure, the volume difference of inspiratory and expiratory tidal volume under the positive pressure ventilation. The plateau pressure, medium pressure and Compliance will also be recorded at the corresponding cuff inflating volume, before and after measuring OLP. The OLP will be measured simultaneously at the corresponding cuff inflating volume, by setting the airway pressure relief valve (APL) of the breathing circuit to 40 cmH20 at a fixed gas flow rate of 4 L/ min and reading the airway pressure on manometer at which equilibrium of airway pressure will be established or at the pressure the air leakage will be heard.
Fiberoptic visibility scores will be recorded on a scale of 1 to 4 (4: only vocal cords visible, 3: vocal cords plus posterior epiglottis visible, 2: vocal cords plus anterior epiglottis visible, 1: vocal cords not seen). A score of 1 will be considered the worst and a score of 4 was considered the best.
Any adverse events (i.e., desaturation (pulse oximetry\< 90%), aspiration/regurgitation, bronchospasm, airway obstruction, coughing, gagging or vomiting) and corresponding interventions will be recorded.
After the procedure, all participants will be transferred to the recovery unit and observed for at least 1 hour. Observed adverse effects, such as sore throat, hoarseness, aphasia, nausea and vomiting will be recorded in the recovery room period.
At 24h, a home telephone interview will record these parameters, as well as participants satisfaction scores using visual analog scales.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cuff inflation by the residual volume
LMA will be inserted with the initial inflating volume correspondent to residual volume group (RV group):
volume result of equilibrating pressure between intracuff pressure and atmospheric pressure. A 20 mL syringe without plunger is connected to the laryngeal cuff for 5 minutes
Intracuff pressure measurement
Intracuff pressure is measured by a pressure manometer.
cuff inflation by half of the maximum volume
LMA will be inserted with the initial inflating volume correspondent to half of the maximum volume recommended by manufacturers (MV group)
Intracuff pressure measurement
Intracuff pressure is measured by a pressure manometer.
unchanged cuff inflation volume
LMA will be inserted unchanged (NV group): LMA is unpacked and used without inflating or deflating the cuff.
Intracuff pressure measurement
Intracuff pressure is measured by a pressure manometer.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intracuff pressure measurement
Intracuff pressure is measured by a pressure manometer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I-III
* fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure and EBUS-TBNA procedure programmed.
* Fasted for 6 hours before procedure.
* Management of the airway for the same anesthetic.
* Use de laryngeal mask airway for boarding and maintenance of airway permeability.
Exclusion Criteria
* predictors of difficult airway such restricted mouth opening (\< 2 cm of interincisal distance)
* patients with any pathology of the neck, upper respiratory or upper alimentary tract
* dysphagia o hoarseness.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Teresa Prim
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
TERESA PRIM MARTINEZ, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
HOSPITAL La Paz
NICOLÁS BROGLY, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital La Paz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Teresa Prim Martinez
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):652-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf4346.
Ghai B, Sethi S, Ram J, Wig J. Cuff filling volumes for pediatric classic laryngeal mask airways: comparison of clinical end points versus adjusted cuff pressure. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):122-6. doi: 10.1111/pan.12023. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Keller C, Puhringer F, Brimacombe JR. Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;81(2):186-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.2.186.
Li BB, Yan J, Zhou HG, Hao J, Liu AJ, Ma ZL. Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 5;128(19):2570-6. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.166034.
Ruananukun N, Watcharotayangul J, Jeeranukosol S, Komonhirun R. Correlation and variation of cuff inflating volumes and pressures in different adult models of laryngeal mask: a prospective randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 7;20(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01028-4.
Shariffuddin II, Teoh WH, Tang E, Hashim N, Loh PS. Ambu(R) AuraGain versus LMA Supreme Second Seal: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Mar;45(2):244-250. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500215.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
idipaz 5735
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.