Randomized Comparative Study Between Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and I Gel Airway in Obese Patients Having BMI 35-40 During Elective Non Abdominal Surgery.
NCT ID: NCT03843827
Last Updated: 2019-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-09
2019-05-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25
NCT01003327
Efficiency of I-gel Supraglottic Airway Device in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Position in Obese Patient
NCT04119245
Ventilation Efficacy of Size 3 or Size 4 I-gel in Female Patient Weighing 50 to 60 Kilograms
NCT03528590
Comparison of Gastric Insufflation With the Classic Igel Laryngeal Mask and the New Igelplus Laryngeal Mask Using Gastric Ultrasound
NCT06578598
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel and the Self-pressurized Air-q in Elderly Patients
NCT04365192
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* GA (n=25) in which classic laryngeal mask was used for ventilation.
* GB (n=25) in which I gel was used for ventilation. In our study the median insertion time was in I gel lesser than cLMA (9 s vs 10 s) respectively that was statistically significant but clinically insignificance. Higher leaking pressure was in I gel group (25cmh2o vs 18cmh2o) than cLMA group that was statistically significant. Our main finding in the study was that both supraglottic airway devices; the classic LMA and the I GEL mask are satisfactory devices providing high airway leaking pressures. Although both devices provide high airway leaking pressures, our study revealed that the I gel mask provides a better seal with the glottic aperture and shorter time of insertion than cLMA. Both devices showed also effective ventilation, more hemodynamic stability and no episode of hypoxia with minimal postoperative complications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
1. Group A (n = 25), in which classic LMA is used for ventilation.
2. Group B (n = 25), in which I gel is used for ventilation.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (LMA Group)
Active Comparator: Group A (LMA Group) LMA-Classic™ laryngeal mask airway (Classic™LMA) by Dr. Archie Brain into clinical practice in 1988 brought about a revolution in anesthesia. In the literature, there are over 2,500 studies supporting Classic™ LMA usage. Following the success and popularity of Classic™ LMA, many different variants of this device have been designed and marketed,trying to offer a simple and effective alternative to the endotracheal intubation.
Laryngeal Mask Airway
The aim of this study is to compare between cLMA and I gel regarding insertion success rate, the time of insertion, leaking pressure, assessment of position by fiber optic, hemodynamic, Spo2 for each device during insertion and maintenance of general anaesthesia and postoperative complications in obese patients
Group B (I gel Group)
I gel is a new type of laryngeal mask and doesn't have an inflatable cuff. Because of its thermoplastic elastomer structure, it exactly adapts to the supraglottic tissue by binding with body temperature,thus minimising air leakage
I gel Airway
I gel is a new type of laryngeal mask and doesn't have an inflatable cuff. Because of its thermoplastic elastomer structure, it exactly adapts to the supraglottic tissue by binding with body temperature, thus minimising air leakage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laryngeal Mask Airway
The aim of this study is to compare between cLMA and I gel regarding insertion success rate, the time of insertion, leaking pressure, assessment of position by fiber optic, hemodynamic, Spo2 for each device during insertion and maintenance of general anaesthesia and postoperative complications in obese patients
I gel Airway
I gel is a new type of laryngeal mask and doesn't have an inflatable cuff. Because of its thermoplastic elastomer structure, it exactly adapts to the supraglottic tissue by binding with body temperature, thus minimising air leakage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. both genders
3. BMI 35-40
4. aged 18 - 60 years
5. Mallampati grade I, II with airway score \< 4 according to El Ganzouri score during elective non abdominal surgery ≤ 2hour e.g diagnostic arthroscopy, hysteroscopy and cataract
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age \>60 years or \<18 years,
3. people with hypertension, diabetes, pregnancy, gastro oesophageal reflux disease, cardiovascular ,renal disease4. difficult mask ventilation , obstructive sleep apnea ,any position rather than supine , airway score ≥ 4 according to El Ganzouri score
5\. any form of sore throat ,patients allergic to any drugs used in the study 6. PCV mode if measured tidal volume was lesser than 6 ml/kg it will be excluded.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Abdalla
Professor of Anesthesia &I.C.U and Pain Clinic, Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N 34-2017/Ms
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.